DEFENSE OF AUSTRALIA
Why do we need to read this?
Because this is the second most urgent issue facing Australia at this moment (public health being the first).
The Murdoch media is telling us we are supporting the brave and democratic nation of Ukraine from the evil Vladimir Putin of ruthless leviathan Russia.
If this were true, why are all nations of the southern hemisphere and a large part of the northern hemisphere, supporting Russia?
More specifically, these include all of Africa and Latin America, the Middle East, Turkey, India, South Asia, South-East Asia, and China... all opposed to the US in this matter.
How the hell did we get ourselves isolated on this planet by the majority of world nations, who oppose Biden's war mongering? And how do we get to call this a defense policy? Why are we helping to nudge the planet into WWIII?
The true story about Ukraine is simple. Eight years a go, Victoria Nuland of the US spent $2.4 billion to launch a coup in Ukraine, forcing the democratically elected leader to flee for his life. Then 15,000 Russian-speaking Ukrainians were killed by the new leader, Zelensky. The east Ukrainians pleaded with Russia for help and, 7 years later, Putin stepped in.
The US has set up 30 biolabs in Ukraine and the worry is these are to spread disease in Russia. In 2014, the US promised NATO would not come one inch closer to Russia. Obviously, they lied.
The US has set up what is called a proxy war. It does not want to go up against Russia because Russia has superior missiles. So every other country has been encouraged to send in troops and weapons. Most of the weapons are ancient and do not work.
The reason most nations oppose the US is that Biden is in the wrong. America is the same war monger it was in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan yet most Australians believe what they are told by Rupert Murdoch's media.
You would think we would wake up but, no, here we go again. This may be weeks away or many months, but it will not be long before missiles are aimed at Australia. Former PM Malcolm Fraser warned us seven times this would happen but we did not listen to him either.
This crisis did not happen overnight.
The plan to destabilise and globalise Australia was launched in 1973, and slipped into top gear in 1975 with the sacking of the Whitlam Government.
The timing was to prevent Whitlam from exposing high level CIA agents in Australia, and to prevent him from closing down Pine Gap. (The page on this website "How Australia was Globalised" provides the details).
Leap forward to today...
The US is installing a military missile base in Arnhem Land, a project which has been presented to the Australian people as a civilian aerospace project. Given the current geopolitical context, the most likely function of the base will be for nuclear-armed missiles whose target is China. The first missile launch is scheduled for June 2022. Meanwhile, it appears likely that Melville Bay, just 40 Ks north of the missile base and host to Riotinto, will house the future US Asia/South Pacific Navy.
There are several US installations in the NT, which are protected by 2600 Marines and land invasion vehicles, plant and equipment, including tanks. Why are tanks needed? if not to contain future public resistance to this occupation.
These and other bases add up to nine likely reprisal or preemptive nuclear strikes in Australia by China, precipitated by currently intensifying US belligerence in the region.
On seven distinct occasions, former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser warned us that our foolish alliance with America would drag us into WWIII, a risk not offset by any reliable protection.
"America cannot be trusted" Fraser said, noting that the US had twice sided with Indonesia against us. In 1975, Indonesia planned an invasion of Australia, with the active support of the United States. And in 1983, following the joint US/Indonesia/Australia mapping of the floors of the Arafura and Timor Seas, the resultant data was shared between the US and Indonesia. Australia was left out in the cold, even though we paid our share and Indonesia did not.
As Fraser clarified, there is no defense alliance. America is not required to defend us and most certainly will never do so.
What should we do about this?
My immediate instinct is that all Australians should be acquainted with the truth of this US invasion of our sovereign country, and about the phony ANZAS Treaty.
But the issues do not end there. In 1987 a Federal study concluded that any missile base in north Australia would place residents at risk.
More recently it has been revealed that all US missiles use solid fuel, which releases significant amounts of chlorine gas into the atmosphere, along other seriously toxic substances. Quite apart from being lethally dangerous to Aboriginal people living in the region, chlorine gas damages the ozone layer. I very much doubt that local indigenous people would appreciate a rise in cancers and blindness.
Supporters of the missiles claim they will be launched on a flight path that ascends to the East, over the Gulf of Carpentaria and therefore will not be a risk to local populations. This is disengenuous because the scientists know full well that most launchings will be in the Dry Season, when the vigourous south easterly winds will direct the exhaust squarely over the following communities: Yirrkala, Gunyangara, Wallaby Beach, Nhulunbuy, Dholtji, Gikal, Gawa, Banthula, Nanyingburra, Dharawa, Djurranalpi, Ganpura, Gulamarri, and Gitan.
In the Wet Season, the gases will drift unpredictably, with winds varying from westerly to northerly to easterly within the space of hours, bringing toxins to Bawaka, Dhulmulmiya, and Dhaniya; including perhaps Buymarr, and as far south as Birany Birany.
The ozone layer as far south a Groote Eylandt may be damaged. The contamination range will depend upon size of missile, and payload.
These will also be the communities threatened with nuclear fallout should the Chinese direct a nuclear strike to Gulkula. Perhaps somebody with friends in the CCP could gauge their intentions.
Should not Arnhem Land Aborigines be warned of the risks? None that I know have any idea that their lives are threatened by military activity. The agency that should warn them is the Nothern Land Council, but that entity exists to facilitate mining and expedite genocide, not to help indigenous people as it so piously claims. And the NT Government is gung ho with the missiles.
Unbelievably, the Australian mass media knows about these issues but will not inform the public; and this includes the ABC... "the people's media". The reason is simple... corruption. The missile base was approved of and supported by the NT Government's Chief Minister, Michael Gunner. Gunner's wife, who works for the ABC, wrote an article favourable to the missile site proposal. The adjective "gushy" comes to mind.
This obvious conflict of interest should have required her to redact herself from any professional connection to the site or associated issues. Her involvement explains why the clearly partisan ABC failed to pass on the truth to the public.
The hazardous discharges from the missiles are worrying enough, but the US is dangerously beligerant even though it is now a second-rate military power. Twenty years of occupation of Afghanistan cost the US $2.5 trillion it should have invested in upgrading missile technology. Russia now has missiles America can only dream of, and America will now never catch up.
Recently, the US made its third attempt to fix the patriot missile guidance system, and failed. Comically, the trial run was launched from the wing of a 47 year old B52. The missile refused to release from the wing. On the second attempt, it released, but failed to fire.
The US has been forced to lie about its missiles. In a recent Middle East conflict, it claimed to have shot down several ancient scud missiles. Independent observors say none came down.
Israel was confident its Iron Dome defense system would knock out any approaching missiles but found an exhaused scud within metres of its nuclear facility. The truth is there is no defense against missile attack, which is why WWIII will be fought with missiles.
Meanwhile, Russia has seven different missiles that are superior to anything Amarica owns.
For example, the Zircon is a hypersonic scramjet missile that flies at altitudes up to fifty Ks, is fully manoeuverable right up until target strike, and has a speed of Mach 25. This is a configuration that the Pentagon recently claimed was technologically impossible. The Zircon can traverse thousands of kilometres and hit a target with an accuracy of 0.5 of a metre. This means that Russia can sink every US aircraft carrier with the same number of missiles, and the US has no defense for this, whatsoever.
Other missiles, such as the Vanguard, have shorter travel distances but are still superior to the US lineup.
Bizarrely, the US is attempting to precipitate war with Russia, entirely ignoring the role of America's Victoria Nuland in investing $4 billion to stage a military coup in 2014, overthrowing the democratically elected government of Ukraine and replacing it with a Nazi regime. This was followed by the aggressive bombing and shelling of eastern Ukraine killing some 15,000 Russian-speaking civilians.
That Putin resisted rescuing these people for seven years before finally responding to their pleas, says much about his cautious nature. Yet the Murdoch media presents Biden as the saviour of the "innocent" Ukrainian regime leaders.
All of this is building up to precisely the WWIII scenario that Malcolm Fraser warned us against, inviting the prospect of China in alliance with Russia, followed by Chinese preemptive or reprisal strikes against Australia as America's lapdog puppet, and host to the US Australian-epicentred hemisphere of spy and navigation satellite installations.
If I may rephrase that in less confusing terminology, China will direct missiles to Pine Gap, Tindal air base, Darwin Airport (staging area), Five Eyes, the spy satellite installations in Middle Point and Shoal Bay, the submarine base in Darwin Harbour, and the Gulkula missile launching installation.
Being critically essential to the US military, the spy and navigation salellite installations will be first strike targets, therefore there will be no warning. Darwin will cease to exist, permanently.
That would be a total of eight strikes, with massive loss of life, and I have no idea what other US installations are in other states. Or, for that matter, if capital cities will become targets. One would presume so, at least in the second round of strikes.
Australia needs to do two things, today:
(1) Terminate the US/Australia military alliance and remove all US military bases.
(2) Declare a new policy of Armed Neutrality.
If we are indecisive, it may cost us our nation. Some would say this has happened already.
Summation
Hard evidence of missile intentions:
Circumstantial evidence:
Qualified recommendations:
Former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser repeatedly warned Australians that the US will not defend Australia; that there is no binding treaty with the US; that the US has twice previously betrayed Australia in favour of expansionist Indonesia; and that the continued alliance would result in us being sucked into WWIII.
Logistical projections:
Presuming that China will adopt a similar reprisal first-strike nuclear missile strategy to other nations, which parallels that of the Soviet Union during the cold war, should the US provoke war with China, Australia can expect Chinese nuclear strikes in all significant US installations: Pine Gap. Darwin Airport, Middle Point, Shoal Bay, Gulkula, and Tindal Air base, each averaging firestorm-obliteration of 230 square kilometres; plus a similar extent of devastation when Darwin's Inpex gas tanks detonate.
© Copyright Tony Ryan 2018, 2022.
Readers, please pass this information on to your relatives and friends; and to your local member.
All Australians must learn the truth about the risks of ozone layer damage from solid rocket fuel toxicity, and possible reprisal or preemptive nuclear strikes by China against US war weaponry.
To comment below, please click on "click here to edit" to enhance your reply. All replies will be responded to.
Because this is the second most urgent issue facing Australia at this moment (public health being the first).
The Murdoch media is telling us we are supporting the brave and democratic nation of Ukraine from the evil Vladimir Putin of ruthless leviathan Russia.
If this were true, why are all nations of the southern hemisphere and a large part of the northern hemisphere, supporting Russia?
More specifically, these include all of Africa and Latin America, the Middle East, Turkey, India, South Asia, South-East Asia, and China... all opposed to the US in this matter.
How the hell did we get ourselves isolated on this planet by the majority of world nations, who oppose Biden's war mongering? And how do we get to call this a defense policy? Why are we helping to nudge the planet into WWIII?
The true story about Ukraine is simple. Eight years a go, Victoria Nuland of the US spent $2.4 billion to launch a coup in Ukraine, forcing the democratically elected leader to flee for his life. Then 15,000 Russian-speaking Ukrainians were killed by the new leader, Zelensky. The east Ukrainians pleaded with Russia for help and, 7 years later, Putin stepped in.
The US has set up 30 biolabs in Ukraine and the worry is these are to spread disease in Russia. In 2014, the US promised NATO would not come one inch closer to Russia. Obviously, they lied.
The US has set up what is called a proxy war. It does not want to go up against Russia because Russia has superior missiles. So every other country has been encouraged to send in troops and weapons. Most of the weapons are ancient and do not work.
The reason most nations oppose the US is that Biden is in the wrong. America is the same war monger it was in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan yet most Australians believe what they are told by Rupert Murdoch's media.
You would think we would wake up but, no, here we go again. This may be weeks away or many months, but it will not be long before missiles are aimed at Australia. Former PM Malcolm Fraser warned us seven times this would happen but we did not listen to him either.
This crisis did not happen overnight.
The plan to destabilise and globalise Australia was launched in 1973, and slipped into top gear in 1975 with the sacking of the Whitlam Government.
The timing was to prevent Whitlam from exposing high level CIA agents in Australia, and to prevent him from closing down Pine Gap. (The page on this website "How Australia was Globalised" provides the details).
Leap forward to today...
The US is installing a military missile base in Arnhem Land, a project which has been presented to the Australian people as a civilian aerospace project. Given the current geopolitical context, the most likely function of the base will be for nuclear-armed missiles whose target is China. The first missile launch is scheduled for June 2022. Meanwhile, it appears likely that Melville Bay, just 40 Ks north of the missile base and host to Riotinto, will house the future US Asia/South Pacific Navy.
There are several US installations in the NT, which are protected by 2600 Marines and land invasion vehicles, plant and equipment, including tanks. Why are tanks needed? if not to contain future public resistance to this occupation.
These and other bases add up to nine likely reprisal or preemptive nuclear strikes in Australia by China, precipitated by currently intensifying US belligerence in the region.
On seven distinct occasions, former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser warned us that our foolish alliance with America would drag us into WWIII, a risk not offset by any reliable protection.
"America cannot be trusted" Fraser said, noting that the US had twice sided with Indonesia against us. In 1975, Indonesia planned an invasion of Australia, with the active support of the United States. And in 1983, following the joint US/Indonesia/Australia mapping of the floors of the Arafura and Timor Seas, the resultant data was shared between the US and Indonesia. Australia was left out in the cold, even though we paid our share and Indonesia did not.
As Fraser clarified, there is no defense alliance. America is not required to defend us and most certainly will never do so.
What should we do about this?
My immediate instinct is that all Australians should be acquainted with the truth of this US invasion of our sovereign country, and about the phony ANZAS Treaty.
But the issues do not end there. In 1987 a Federal study concluded that any missile base in north Australia would place residents at risk.
More recently it has been revealed that all US missiles use solid fuel, which releases significant amounts of chlorine gas into the atmosphere, along other seriously toxic substances. Quite apart from being lethally dangerous to Aboriginal people living in the region, chlorine gas damages the ozone layer. I very much doubt that local indigenous people would appreciate a rise in cancers and blindness.
Supporters of the missiles claim they will be launched on a flight path that ascends to the East, over the Gulf of Carpentaria and therefore will not be a risk to local populations. This is disengenuous because the scientists know full well that most launchings will be in the Dry Season, when the vigourous south easterly winds will direct the exhaust squarely over the following communities: Yirrkala, Gunyangara, Wallaby Beach, Nhulunbuy, Dholtji, Gikal, Gawa, Banthula, Nanyingburra, Dharawa, Djurranalpi, Ganpura, Gulamarri, and Gitan.
In the Wet Season, the gases will drift unpredictably, with winds varying from westerly to northerly to easterly within the space of hours, bringing toxins to Bawaka, Dhulmulmiya, and Dhaniya; including perhaps Buymarr, and as far south as Birany Birany.
The ozone layer as far south a Groote Eylandt may be damaged. The contamination range will depend upon size of missile, and payload.
These will also be the communities threatened with nuclear fallout should the Chinese direct a nuclear strike to Gulkula. Perhaps somebody with friends in the CCP could gauge their intentions.
Should not Arnhem Land Aborigines be warned of the risks? None that I know have any idea that their lives are threatened by military activity. The agency that should warn them is the Nothern Land Council, but that entity exists to facilitate mining and expedite genocide, not to help indigenous people as it so piously claims. And the NT Government is gung ho with the missiles.
Unbelievably, the Australian mass media knows about these issues but will not inform the public; and this includes the ABC... "the people's media". The reason is simple... corruption. The missile base was approved of and supported by the NT Government's Chief Minister, Michael Gunner. Gunner's wife, who works for the ABC, wrote an article favourable to the missile site proposal. The adjective "gushy" comes to mind.
This obvious conflict of interest should have required her to redact herself from any professional connection to the site or associated issues. Her involvement explains why the clearly partisan ABC failed to pass on the truth to the public.
The hazardous discharges from the missiles are worrying enough, but the US is dangerously beligerant even though it is now a second-rate military power. Twenty years of occupation of Afghanistan cost the US $2.5 trillion it should have invested in upgrading missile technology. Russia now has missiles America can only dream of, and America will now never catch up.
Recently, the US made its third attempt to fix the patriot missile guidance system, and failed. Comically, the trial run was launched from the wing of a 47 year old B52. The missile refused to release from the wing. On the second attempt, it released, but failed to fire.
The US has been forced to lie about its missiles. In a recent Middle East conflict, it claimed to have shot down several ancient scud missiles. Independent observors say none came down.
Israel was confident its Iron Dome defense system would knock out any approaching missiles but found an exhaused scud within metres of its nuclear facility. The truth is there is no defense against missile attack, which is why WWIII will be fought with missiles.
Meanwhile, Russia has seven different missiles that are superior to anything Amarica owns.
For example, the Zircon is a hypersonic scramjet missile that flies at altitudes up to fifty Ks, is fully manoeuverable right up until target strike, and has a speed of Mach 25. This is a configuration that the Pentagon recently claimed was technologically impossible. The Zircon can traverse thousands of kilometres and hit a target with an accuracy of 0.5 of a metre. This means that Russia can sink every US aircraft carrier with the same number of missiles, and the US has no defense for this, whatsoever.
Other missiles, such as the Vanguard, have shorter travel distances but are still superior to the US lineup.
Bizarrely, the US is attempting to precipitate war with Russia, entirely ignoring the role of America's Victoria Nuland in investing $4 billion to stage a military coup in 2014, overthrowing the democratically elected government of Ukraine and replacing it with a Nazi regime. This was followed by the aggressive bombing and shelling of eastern Ukraine killing some 15,000 Russian-speaking civilians.
That Putin resisted rescuing these people for seven years before finally responding to their pleas, says much about his cautious nature. Yet the Murdoch media presents Biden as the saviour of the "innocent" Ukrainian regime leaders.
All of this is building up to precisely the WWIII scenario that Malcolm Fraser warned us against, inviting the prospect of China in alliance with Russia, followed by Chinese preemptive or reprisal strikes against Australia as America's lapdog puppet, and host to the US Australian-epicentred hemisphere of spy and navigation satellite installations.
If I may rephrase that in less confusing terminology, China will direct missiles to Pine Gap, Tindal air base, Darwin Airport (staging area), Five Eyes, the spy satellite installations in Middle Point and Shoal Bay, the submarine base in Darwin Harbour, and the Gulkula missile launching installation.
Being critically essential to the US military, the spy and navigation salellite installations will be first strike targets, therefore there will be no warning. Darwin will cease to exist, permanently.
That would be a total of eight strikes, with massive loss of life, and I have no idea what other US installations are in other states. Or, for that matter, if capital cities will become targets. One would presume so, at least in the second round of strikes.
Australia needs to do two things, today:
(1) Terminate the US/Australia military alliance and remove all US military bases.
(2) Declare a new policy of Armed Neutrality.
If we are indecisive, it may cost us our nation. Some would say this has happened already.
Summation
Hard evidence of missile intentions:
- Online reference to US weapon makers Ratheon and Lockheed Martin; in discussion with Australian Department of Defense, took place five years ago. Perusal of this website resulted in its removal from the Internet.
- NT Government Budget Estimates Hearing reference to the missile base as "contributing to the American military presence".
- Media-recorded reference by US navy Chief of Operations Admiral Johnathon Greenert to an intended US Naval presence in the Top End; Melville Bay being the only feasible selection.
Circumstantial evidence:
- US to lose Guam and Okinawa bases, creating a military vacuum in the Pacific;
- US-stated intention to establish a comprehensive military presence in the Top End;
- The actual presence of US Air Force, 2600 Marines, and a significant storage of land invasion equipment, including tanks. The installation of a missile launch platform and naval base would complete the comprehensive presence formula.
- Melville Bay is only 40 handy Ks from the missile base.
Qualified recommendations:
Former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser repeatedly warned Australians that the US will not defend Australia; that there is no binding treaty with the US; that the US has twice previously betrayed Australia in favour of expansionist Indonesia; and that the continued alliance would result in us being sucked into WWIII.
Logistical projections:
Presuming that China will adopt a similar reprisal first-strike nuclear missile strategy to other nations, which parallels that of the Soviet Union during the cold war, should the US provoke war with China, Australia can expect Chinese nuclear strikes in all significant US installations: Pine Gap. Darwin Airport, Middle Point, Shoal Bay, Gulkula, and Tindal Air base, each averaging firestorm-obliteration of 230 square kilometres; plus a similar extent of devastation when Darwin's Inpex gas tanks detonate.
© Copyright Tony Ryan 2018, 2022.
Readers, please pass this information on to your relatives and friends; and to your local member.
All Australians must learn the truth about the risks of ozone layer damage from solid rocket fuel toxicity, and possible reprisal or preemptive nuclear strikes by China against US war weaponry.
To comment below, please click on "click here to edit" to enhance your reply. All replies will be responded to.
RSS Feed 