CONSUMER HEALTH ISSUES
I am a health product consumer and I make no claim to be an expert in any science or discipline and cannot therefore be judged or criticized as a purported expert. Thus, the AMA's usual method of silencing criticism... prosecution for practicing medicine without a licence... cannot be directed at me.
As a consumer, and among a plethora of other serious health concerns, I see evidence that doctors and the pharmaceutical industry are injuring, not only adult Australians, but babies and children. Consider this example:
In 1934, following the launching of the first vaccination regime, the first case of autism appeared. Within 20 years, the occurrence of autism had evolved to 1 in 10,000. Now in Australia it is reported as one in sixty-seven; and in the US, one in fifty-eight. The increase has neatly paralleled the expansion of vaccinations... which should have alarm bells ringing, but which are inexplicably silent.
Overuse of antibiotics is also implicated; as are GM foods, glyphosates, and the effects of agricultural monocultures.
WHY HAS GOVERNMENT NOT LAUNCHED A COMPREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION?
Answer: Because government is controlled by the same corporate lobbies who own the sickness industry... pharmaceutical giants, chemical producers, the nuclear industry, and most ruthless of all, health professionals... to my mind, the Medical Mafia.
But I have other concerns.
I look around me and see sickly, malnourished and obese citizens.
I see government protecting toxic food industries; protecting the illicit use of antibiotics, 70% of which is used in factory farming. There is no doubt whatsoever that factory farming use of antibiotics will generate untreatable global pandemics that will kill millions of people in western nations. I see approval of GM crops now being banned in Europe and Russia as already proved dangerous to human health, yet these are released in Australia. Meanwhile, pesticides and herbicides and othehr chemicals conclusively linked to terminal cancers are approved by the Australian Government.
Hilariously, we are told that nature's own protection from the sun, our sun tan, is unhealthy. We are told to slip, slop, slap our way into vitaman D deficiency and, quite possibly, cancer developing as a result of the toxins used in many sun screens.
Alarmed by these and other health issues, many consumers have called for an independent and transparent research facility in Australia which will clear for safety all ingested substances BEFORE THESE ARE MADE AVAILABLE TO CONSUMERS.
Government refuses to comment.
And that silence is the entire purpose of this document.
Current testing regimes are unacceptable because they are hopelessly corrupt, compromised by self-interest. We reject current safety-testing by the very manufacturers of these drugs, or by agencies within the jurisdiction of America's corrupt and corporate-controlled FDA. All testing must be done to the satisfaction of the Australian people; which means a Federal Government-funded, independent and absolutely transparent research facility.
In this regard, the CSIRO is rejected as too politicised and influenced by the corporate world.
Meanwhile, we are establishing a data base which records the names of doctors, scientists, academics and politicians who do not support establishment of such a facility, with a view to prosecution some time in the future.
What follows on this page, are links, conjectures, observations, reports, and information which appear to be recommended by available evidence. I do not see it as my role to advise or to persuade, and readers are urged to form their own opinions, derived from their own research.
Nevertheless, the following texts tend to offer support for the campaign to establish a research facility that should end the speculation, suspicion, and fear that has gripped many Australian parents. The fact that no doctor supports this campaign has convinced many Australians that doctors are the frontline of a ruthless industry alliance that profits obscenely from sickness and death and, moreover, promotes practices that actually make us sicker.
Finally, there is the matter of proselytised definitions which are central to the medical/big pharma propaganda and indoctrination campaign.
The 'health industry' is in fact the 'sickness industry' and 'health professionals' are indeed 'sickness professionals'. Only a miniscule element of this industry is dedicated to genuine good health advice, and few medical doctors and nurses have any grasp of healthy living. Complementary to the pseudo-medical fraternity are dieticians and nutritionists, who routinely advise sustenance regimes guaranteed to kill.
For decades, these charletans have warned against such healthy foods as eggs and animals fats, guiding us instead towards low fat processed foods, high-glutin-content grains, fruit juices, and homogenised and pasteurised dairy products. They have resolutley refused to point out the well-known dangers of rBST, rBGH, sugars; food preservatives, enhancements and colouring; food antibiotics and hormones, and processed foods. Readers who are not up to speed in this regard wil no doubt, in the fullness of time, appreciate the level of negligence endemiic to these roles. Unfortunately, your laziness wil have cost you your good health.
Perhaps capturing the peak award for cynical exploitation of human illness and misery is the Cancer Industry. With rare exceptions, these predators imply cures when their radiation, chemotherapy and surgical treatments do not cure cancers at all, but merely leave their victims to die even more miserably over a prolonged period. In the opinion of many qualified critics, chemo and radiation patients actually die from the treatments.
This cynicism is most transparently evident in skin cance surgery. Wealthy patients are offered the plastic surgery which is essential for adequate tussue removal which includes all invaded tissue. Poor patients receive inadequate tissue removals, which ensures the cancer will return in 20 years or less.
The hundreds of doctors and medical researchers who have demonstrated successful alternative cancer cures have been victimised, ridiculed, vilified, prosecuted, imprisoned, and even killed.
I personally, have used one such cancer cure successfully over the past seven years, which infuriated one young Chinese hospital doctor so much that she phoned my daughter interstate to inform her I am suffering from dementia; ignoring that I am currently learning several local Aboriginal languages to a degree incompatiblke with her diagnosis. But then, medical doctors have no respect for evidence or logic. Belief in their own superiority and professional invincibility is all that matters.
New diseases and epidemics have emerged since WWII and it is becoming apparent that their proliferation awkwardly parallels a series of medical initiatives: vaccines, over-use of antibiotics, agricultural monocultures, other drugs, and x-rays; in addition to thousands of new chemicals now ingested or otherwise absorbed by the human body.
Additional interactive changes to our environment are possibly due to increased ambient radioactivity, suspected local radioactivity from nuclear tests, depleted uranium weapons (used in Australia), herbicides (glyphosate), and nico-pesticides. And, invading our diet are genetically modified organisms, MSG, aspartame, fluoride, and food preservatives and colours (eg: it has been shown that apparent MS symptoms disappeared when patients ceased consuming diet coke... aspartame).
In other words, in a context of overwhelming change in the constituents of our environment, many medical and pharmaceutical interventions, treatments and remedies have proved to be a two-edged sword and it is the purpose of this article to briefly explore the published results of independent research in order to assist people, particularly parents, to decide:
- What treatments are unreservedly recommended for themselves and their children;
- In the balance of circumstances, what treatments can be considered permissible with cautions;
- What treatments should be abandoned by public health authorities; and,
- How legitimate treatments can be managed to minimise side effects, injury or death.
Perhaps not so inexplicably, there have been vigorous attempts by the media to portray the vaccination debate in alarmist, absolutist and extremist terms, and to portray critics as dangerous idiots who should be punished, even imprisoned; but out there in the real community there is much less certainty.
Most Australians are unaware of the risks and consider some treatments to be well recommended and others less so.
Increasingly, there is disquiet over certain issues. For example, in spite of scoffing and ridicule of organic foods by an apparent alliance of doctors and the Grocery Council, a recent (Australian) Sunshine Coast (SSCD) survey showed 100% of respondents either bought exclusively organic foods or wished they could afford to. Not one respondent pooh-poohed organic foods, in contrast to the views of the Grocery Council and other duopoly and pharmaceutical lobbies.
This reflects a collapse of confidence in official reassurances regarding the health risks of eating vegetables, fruit, grains, meat and dairy products created through the intervention of large chemical corporations.
Similar official reassurances regarding genetically modified (GM) foods are in sharp conflict with the actions of several European and other governments and independent research organisations, which point to proven risk of organ failure (immediate and intergenerational).
And, in Australia, a RIED survey of 2010 showed 98% of Aussies oppose GM content placed in food without their knowledge or consent. 91% in the same survey opposed mandatory H1N1 vaccinations. We can safely conclude that most Australians want safety barriers set up and enacted into law to protect themselves and their children from harmful substances in food, medical treatments and in the environment.
Not only is this not happening, both Government and the medical/scientific and pharmaceutical lobbies oppose such measures. This is the urgent focus of our concern.
Court actions in UK, Italy, Sweden, India, Nepal, Hungary, France, the US and other nations (see links below) have PROVED instances of injury caused by the following vaccines: polio, mumps, measles, MMR (combo measles, mumps, rubella), H1N1 swine flu, seasonal flu, tetanus (the tetanus/diphtheria/pertussis combo vaccine), and varicella (chicken pox), and the new HPP (Gardasil cervical cancer vaccine); while the Australian Government and Australian Medical Association posture that such risk either does not exist or is so low as to be of negligible concern.
Several years ago, for a loose conglomerate of typical Aussie parents and grandparents, our collective position at the commencement of this project was that many vaccines, antibiotics, and other medically-approved substances that found their way into our bodies, were not opposed per se.
Nevertheless, we quickly discovered that some of these drugs were held suspect by highly qualified experts, or were judicially proved in Europe and elsewhere to carry unacceptable risk. This should be common knowledge, but with all media securely under the control of Rupert Murdoch such information is severely restricted and reaches Australians only through the Internet.
The close association between Murdoch and the dynasties who own the pharmaceutical and chemical corporations cannot be seen as mere coincidence. The discovery that there was ongoing scientific alarm registered in other countries served to enhance our motivation to launch this modest information package.
Government cannot forever feign ignorance. With unimpeded access to the truth, Australian authorities continue to oppose a policy of independent Australian analysis prior to public exposure to inadequately tested substances.
Most prominent at risk here are pregnant women, babies and children. In some circles, legal avenues are currently being pursued to secure prosecutions for Ministerial negligence, but with a politically-appointed judiciary fruitful outcomes seem unlikely.
For our part, we will take whatever action we can to ensure every Australian is aware of this situation.
- Why, since 1945 (or even since 1984), has incidence of autism risen from one in ten thousand infants, to one in one hundred? (in some countries, 1:63; in New Jersey, 1:47).
- Why, in national courts of law, and in independent research institutes, are vaccinations so clearly implicated in autism, yet there is no echoing official response in Australia?
Claimed health risks of some vaccines and undermanaged antibiotic regimes
Recent breakthroughs have dramatically stimulated discussion on vaccination and autism. Dr Natasha Campbell-McBride was one of those neuroligists who made a breakthrough when she cured her own child of autism largely through reintroducing gut flora.
A pattern appears to have emerged that vaccinations interfere with the natural development of children’s immune systems leading to chronic infections: typically tonsil, adenoid, and ear infections; but also chronic diarrhoea (initiated by lack of protective gut flora, and then again exacerbated by antibiotics and vaccines). Doctors know full well that no infant under two years can benefit from vaccines but the regime is introduced from birth purely to encourage parents to vaccinate. Thus, toxic adjuvants and micro-organisms are introduced into a baby's tissue as a PR exercise. Anyone who would do this without proven justification would have to be a monster. Yet there is no empirical evidence that vaccinations have reduced incidence of disease, as claimed.
The complex sequence of multi-sourced attacks on infant's health appears to be as follows:
1. Since the introduction of the contraceptive pill, which is thought to compromise gut flora, thus-effected women appear to pass on this deficiency to their babies (see Gut And Psychological Syndrome… GAPS); who grow up to pass on a more enhanced gut flora deficiency in their own children; and so on. This is believed to be intergenerationally cumulative. Such babies, especially if not breastfed are highly susceptible to infections. (Breastfed babies become susceptible when breastfeeding ceases, but bottle-fed babies suffer from birth). Because they have yet to develop an immune system, babies are incapable of benefiting from vaccines.
2. Routinely, as infections or symptoms occur, doctors prescribe antibiotics and the consequential further or complete elimination of gut flora exposes the child to atypical infections while simultaneously depressing normal immune system development. One strain of bacteria forms an exclusive and dominant colony and produces a toxin that damages parts of both the cranial and enteric nervous systems; and sometimes the extent of this damage is exacerbated by other factors.
3. Brain and nerve damage is also influenced by the kind of adjuvants used in vaccines, particularly, it would seem, glutamate, aluminium, mercury and formaldehyde; which appear to independently cause brain damage of their own, hardly surprising considering mercury is the second most toxic element after uranium; and glutamate is the substance that regulates early brain development, influenced by the overall immune system (see Dr Blaylock link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUCCdCecLTo&feature=BFa&list=PLA77C01EF916264F7
4. Common and (in this context) highly toxic vaccine adjuvants and additives are: aluminium, monosodium glutamate, sodium phosphate, phenoxyethanol, gelatin, sulphites, yeast protein, antibiotics, RNA and DNA from animal and human tissue cultures, squalene, ethyl glycol (anti-freeze), triton disinfectant, phenol, and polysorbanate 80. Additional chemicals implicated in autism are preservatives 280 and 283. Many of these are extremely toxic in minute doses and at least two of these seriously retard or stop infant brain development, so why are these substances used in medical treatments for babies and children and pregnant women? There is one very obvious answer: because they are cheaper adjuvants than alternatives. This then is partly about profit. These multi-sourced interactive attacks on the brain and nervous system tend to explain the wide spectrum of autism manifestations; possibly exacerbated by aspartame, food MSG and, without doubt, by bottle-feeding of babies. Tragically, breast-feeding is on the decline, with only 34% feeding after three months.
5. A fourth series of effects can be sourced in the active component of the vaccine itself. The polio vaccine administered in India has so far caused 47,000 cases of paralysis, inexplicably dubbed non-polio paralysis by typically dishonest medical scientists. The links below document other substances which may interact with autism-causing factors.
6. A fifth cumulative or even primary concern is contaminants in vaccines. Salk himself admitted in a video interview that there were 37 contaminants in his polio vaccine, ranging from animal protein to pathogen particles.
Autism is not the only issue of contention. Claimed vaccine efficacy itself has been a fraud. Objective research of two centuries of disease incidence reveals that all of the diseases claimed to be reduced or eliminated by vaccines, had declined dramatically long before vaccine programmes were established (ie small pox et al); largely due to improved public nutrition, personal hygiene, and treatment of injuries. The claims by the pharmaceutical corporations and medical industry are bogus Immunization-Graphs-Complete.pdf (application/pdf Object) and http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090123213000970
The high percentage of already vaccinated disease victims demonstrates the vaccines simply do not work (ie pertussis and tetanus).
Some vaccines cause disease. Chicken pox vaccine, for example, causes previously unknown childhood shingles, more dangerous and infinitely more painful than the original childhood disease.
Causing apparently identical and parallel damage as vaccines and antibiotic overuse and non-management, is glysophate. It appears likely that these injuries are intensified by GM and other ingested toxins. Our position is that all must be held suspect until each has been independently tested and cleared; both as individual substances and in combined interaction.
The most immediate logical conclusion is that all suspect vaccines should be immediately taken off the market.
Obviously, each country should also establish an independent and transparent research unit to examine the short and long term effects of all pharmaceutical products and other chemicals, preservatives and GM products that are ingested by humans one way or another. Vaccines that do not work, or that cause disease, or pose high risk of autism or Guillain-Barre Syndrome (H1N1 swine flu vaccine) must be condemned and discontinued.
Currently, almost all safety checking is done by the pharmaceutical corporations themselves and all of it is very short term (ie a few weeks, to 90 days; rather than years). Reliance on America’s FDA is naïve in the extreme, or as many would say, cynical, considering how many FDA executives have origins in the pharmaceutical corporations they are purported to regulate.
Antibiotics should always be followed by restoration of gut flora. Ordinary citizens currently have no reliable information as to how, specifically, this can be achieved and many products in supermarkets are considered suspect.
Caution: Many international experts place different emphasis on the various causative factors listed above. Some see glysophate as the dominating factor, others direct attention to factors not covered here, such as BT Proteins found in GMOs. We view this conflict as only reinforcing our call for independent research.
General observation # 1
It should be noted for future reference that Australia’s Aborigines in the northern states/territories receive more such antibiotics and vaccinations than any comparable group in the world, and that because of deficient diet, largely reliant on processed foods and takeaways, plus vast consumption of sugars and carbohydrates, this has had undoubted implications for Aboriginal health; inviting pointed questions about the number of deaths due to cancer of the liver and other organs.
(Northern) Aboriginal cultural insistence on breastfeeding for two to four years of each infant's life has probably blurred if not partially obviated incidence of autism, but cessation upon the birth of the next sibling would go a long way to explaining later learning difficulties not explained by the cultural gap.
Potentially harmful seasonal flu vaccinations
Data collected from Canada and Hong Kong during 2009-2010 showed that people who received the seasonal flu vaccine in 2008 had twice the risk of getting the H1N1 “swine flu,” compared to those who hadn't received a flu shot.
While these initial findings were largely disputed by the pharmaceutical industry, new research confirms the link between the flu vaccination and an increased risk of more serious bouts of pandemic illness.
Moreover, there are major differences between naturally-acquired immunity and vaccine-induced immunity. With vaccination, you are creating an antibody, but as recent research has confirmed, unvaccinated children naturally build up more antibodies against a wider variety of flu virus strains than vaccinated children. (Dr Joseph Mercola, US).
READERS WISHING TO EXAMINE THE BROADER DIALOGUE REGARDING VACCINATIONS MAY TURN TO ANOTHER PAGE ON THIS WEBSITE, AS PUBLISHED ON GUMSHOE: https://www.weebly.com/editor/main.php#/
LINKS TO SPECIFIC VACCINE ISSUES
(As above) Data collected from Canada and Hong Kong during 2009-2010 showed that people who received the seasonal flu vaccine in 2008 had twice the risk of getting the H1N1 “swine flu,” compared to those who hadn't received a flu shot – Mercola. Flu Vaccine Increases Risk of Serious Pandemic Flu Illness
Swedish children struck down by vaccine-induced narcolepsy. Narcolepsy traced to specific vaccine batches - The Local
The UN’s WHO-declared Grade 6 H1N1 pandemic turned out to be milder than most seasonal flus, and the subsequent untested vaccination carried more disadvantages than it offered protection. But this was not the only problem to emerge from this debacle: According to new research published in JAMA, the more children are exposed to per fluorinated compounds (PFCs), the less likely they are to have a good immune response to vaccinations. The finding suggests that these chemicals can affect children’s immune system enough to make them more vulnerable to infectious diseases. More Evidence That Flu Vaccines Are Worthless
Inadequate testing of flu vaccines exposes efficacy weaknesses, especially in respect of the aged.
Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis: The Lancet Infectious Diseases
The deaths of four infants in Nepal within three hours of receiving measles vaccines, has drawn fresh attention to inadequate reporting systems that mask many times more deaths. As Dr Joseph Mercola observes: A quick search of America’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)2 reveals nearly 5,100 vaccine-related deaths have been reported in the U.S between 1990 and August 2012, as of this writing. The vast majority of deaths – nearly 60 percent – occurred in children under the age of three. Just over 360 of the reported vaccine-associated deaths in the US have been related to any of the measles-containing vaccines.
With adverse event information on over 70 vaccines included in the VAERS database, it is a phenomenal tool that can help you easily identify which vaccines are significantly associated with specific side effects. It is important to know, though, that what is included in VAERS is only a tiny fraction of the vaccine-related serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths that have actually occurred in the U.S.
Studies have estimated that less than 10 percent, to as little as ONE percent, of vaccine side effects are ever reported, so the true side effects and deaths are easily FAR higher than the reported statistics represent. This means there may have been anywhere from 3600 to 36,000 deaths that have occurred in the US alone after children or adults received measles containing vaccines (-Mercola). The Dangers of the Measles Vaccine to Infants
The Sydney Morning Herald parrots pharmaceutical industry claims that vaccines are safe, ignoring the evidence. Institute of Medicine adverse reactions report admits MMR vaccines cause measles, seizures, anaphylaxis and other health problems
Virologists give evidence of falsification of data and inadequate testing by Merk. Merck Accused of Lying About Mumps Vaccine
MMR (measles, mumps & rubella)
Italian Health Ministry admits MMR vaccine caused autism. Dr Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 study that suggested links between MMR, chronic bowel inflammation and lost gut flora has been confirmed in dozens of studies worldwide; but the pharmaceutical industry’s rebuttal and vicious attacks against Andrew Wakefield have been widely reported in the Murdoch media, as justified (see links on Wakefield). httItalian Court Reignites MMR Vaccine Debate
Italian court rules MMR vaccine did trigger autism
New Evidence Supports Dr. Wakefield's MMR Vaccine Study
Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s Interview on His MMR Study
CDC Autism Researcher Indicted for Fraud
MMR causes autism in test monkeys http://vactruth.com/2012/04/29/monkeys-get-autism/. Monkeys Get Autism-like Reactions to MMR & Other Vaccines In University of Pittsburgh Vaccine Study | Vactruth.com
PERTUSSIS (whooping cough)
83% of children with whooping cough were already vaccinated. One doctor says he still recommends the vaccine because it marginally reduces the distressing symptoms. Vaccine failure admitted: Whooping cough outbreaks higher among children already vaccinated
SIDS is linked to vaccines. Hepatitis B Vaccine Highly Linked to Sudden Infant Death
How Technology Has Made Global Polio Eradication Impossible | Pakalert Press
NZ vaccine study. ias1992study.pdf (application/pdf Object) … (NZ Study on vaccination)
General warning about vaccine risks. Say No to Vaccines - don't put your health at risk!
A series of graphs showing measurable impacts of vaccines since WWII are in stark conflict with official claims. Immunization-Graphs-Complete.pdf (application/pdf Object)
Doctors are regularly paid off by pharmaceutical corporations… the correct word is bribed. Eli Lilly admits to more than $200 million dollars worth of doctor payoffs
Dr Blaylock Vaccines and Autism Part 1 of 14 - YouTube
Concluding comments: Vaccines are never 100 percent protective because they provide only temporary, typically inferior immunity compared to that your body would receive from naturally contracting and recovering from a disease. This becomes a question of balance: advantages of the vaccine as opposed to negative effects.
Although tetanus vaccinations were initially presumed by me to be efficacious, it was nevertheless difficult to obtain a tetanus shot not contaminated by diphtheria and pertussis. One might well ask, why? While researching for an uncontaminated tetanus shot we were provided with evidence that makes even tetanus vaccines unsupportable.
Tetanus deaths are rare and tend to be limited to people with diabetes, who cannot feel puncture wounds to their feet and thus neglect treatment. The tetanus micro-organism is anaerobic, that is, it is destroyed by oxygen. Blood contains haemoglobin and this oxygen kills the bacteria. Ergo, if a would bleeds then the tetanus organism is killed. it has been suggested that we should always encourage puncture wounds to bleed.
If bleeding does not occur, hydrogen peroxide applied liberally will provide an adequate source of oxygen. This, in our collective albeit unqqualified opinions, is preferable treatment to the tetanus vaccination.
Gut flora and immune systems, brain damage, autism spectrum conditions.
Your Gut Flora Affects Your Physical and Mental Health
Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride on GAPS Nutritional Program
In Memoriam: Infant Deaths and Vaccination
Vaccine Study | Vactruth.com
Not only does Campbell-McBride’s prevention recommendations and treatment work, there are also successful treatments for advanced cases…
Pharmaceutical industry crimes
GlaxoSmithKline pleads guilty to criminal fraud charges, pays massive $3 billion in fines
Harvard Study Shows the Effects of Fluoride on Children's IQ
Obamacare Mandate: 15-Year-Old Girls Receive Free Sterilizations Without Parental Consent | Pakalert Press
Historical evidence disputes claims of vaccine programmes successes... Immunization-Graphs-Complete.pdf (application/pdf Object) and...
seizures, anaphylaxis and other health problems
In Memoriam: Infant Deaths and Vaccination
Gut flora health can affect our physical and mental health
Dr Joe Mercola:
Ninety percent of the genetic material in our body is not ours, but from the nearly 100 trillion bacteria, fungi, viruses and other microorganisms that compose our microflora. (-ed: ie for every cell in our body there are 10 microbes, the vast majority beneficial and essential).
Our microflora influence our genetic expression, our immune system, weight, mental health, memory, and our risk of numerous chronic and acute diseases, from diabetes to cancer.
It is becoming increasingly clear that destroying our gut flora with antibiotics and poor diet is a primary factor in rising disease rates. Recent research suggests intestinal inflammation may play a crucial role in the development of certain cancers, and glysophate appears to be a major player here.
Our cumulative and academically unqualified, albeit commonsense view of achieving and maintaining good health:
Avoiding non-crucial antibiotics, and beef derived from feedlot cattle dosed with hormones: rBGH in meat and rBST- poisoned milk cows (Posilac); and avoiding sugar by adhering to a low-sugar diet, along with plenty of unpasteurized fermented foods and/or a high-quality probiotic supplements, are crucial elements for restoring and maintaining both our gut’s inner ecosystem and our overall health.
Growing our own vegetables or buying organic foodstuffs, along with avoiding glysophate, are other essential measures. We make these recommendations because these echo the advice offered by organisations and individuals who have impressed us with their competence and integrity.
Researching the research of others is immensely time-consuming and fraught with possible misinterpretation and accidental misrepresentation. If I have made errors, these will eventually be exposed and remedied byt our readers, some of whom are highly qualified.
Why do we do this?
We do this because government does not, although surely this is precisely the function of responsible government.
The salient issue is: Why is the medical profession, government, and the pharmaceutical industry so reluctant to support independent and transparent national research into these issues?
Conversely, why are doctors and scientists of integrity; who point to independent research results implicating medical products in human injury and death, always subjected to character assassination, vilification, and occupational blacklisting; along with ‘medical science’s’ refusal to address the evidence they produce (see links on Dr Andrew Wakefield)? This is especially the case with vaccine problems, GM food effects on health, contraindicated drugs, glysophate, and other pharmaceuticals, and even routine medical procedures that, alarmingly, have never been supported by evidence or testing.
It is in the public interest, therefore, to hereby present this compilation of articles and reports of newly delivered evidence. As an Australian citizen I declare the right to draw my own conclusions, while you, the reader, can equally judge for yourself.
Such self-protection assessments do not require medical training; merely average intelligence and the capacity to read and to think analytically; avenues which are the inalienable right of every citizen.
Context of vaccinations and evidential outcomes
As has been pointed out by expert immunologists, vaccinations do not provide the same protection as natural resistance gained from the disease itself. In spite of expert assurances over several decades, that vaccinations will one day rid humanity of disease, increasingly it has been found that regular boosters are required; that some vaccinations do not work at all (ie flu, pertussis); and that others (Chicken pox) produce effects worse than the original disease (ie childhood shingles, which can destroy eyesight). Ingri Cassel of the VLF in Idaho provided information on tetanus history and vaccines Tetanus – The Disease and the Vaccine, which means the tetanus vaccination too is now rejected.
The AMA has always adopted the attitude that only qualified medicos have the right to decide whether or not remedies, treatments and procedures are good for us; which is plainly an elitist, corrupt and anti-democratic stance. I am not proselytising my own opinion but I do insist that it is my right to make my own decisions, in the interests of protecting my health and my life; and that of my children and grandchildren.
Moreover, the doctors who lobby government for mandatory vaccinations, a practice universally condemned following its use by the Nazi’s Dr Joseph Mengele’s during WWII, will undoubtedly one day be required to justify their stance. It is difficult to identify whether these doctor’s lack integrity, are simply deficient in intelligence, or are willingly ignorant of any research that opposes their self-serving mercenary views. As the internet enables a wider cross-section of the nation to comprehend autism and its relationship with vaccine damage and mismanagement of antibiotics, it will be for the courts and the electorate to judge culpability. Like many Australians, I look forward to protection of children from such injury, and proper care for those already afflicted.
The provided links have stirred governments to act in Europe and in the Russian-influenced states; but not in the US or Australia. No doubt, this failure will eventually provoke legal challenges directed at the AMA and Federal and State Health portfolio holders.
Although vaccinations and many medical treatments are a threat to our health there are several other factors to consider if we wish to live long and active lives. Exhaustive research of extant papers, books and articles has identified what to me has been the most impressive and logical advice, which I provide as follows:
I have no intention of emerging as a personal trainer or exercise/health guru and I recommend that readers do their own research. But it is alarming to see so many Aussies struggling along footpaths, jogging their way into an early grave; or at the very least, a wheelchair.
The human body was never intended to run marathons, and marathon runners have the tendency to die early. The reality is, such running is harmful to joints, the heart, stomach, neck, and, possibly for some, varicose vein-precipitated stroke.
High intensity interval training can achieve the same benefits in one third the time. Essentially, this involves 30 seconds exercise of such intensity that conversation is difficult or impossible, followed by 90 seconds of more relaxed exercise. This should be repeated eight times. A running machine is fine but I personally recommend running barefoot on loose sand. This transfers the exercise work to all parts of the body, multiplies the muscle stress, and mitigates joint injury; and provides a useful discharge opportunity for accumulated bio-electronic accumulations. A 20 minute regime every few days should be adequate. Vital ancillary exercises are weights, pull-ups and lunges.
A warning... if one is in poor physical condition, or aged into the sixties, high intensity interval training can cause groin injury resulting in hernia.
Anyway, a bout of such exercise should be preceded by stretch exercises, with similar afterwards.
Weights are essential to ensure bone density, especially for women and the elderly. A gym should provide the right equipment but home gyms are good, especially a bench press and pull-up facility. The pull up bar can also be used to hang from the arms with legs out straight at right angle to the body, providing exercise for the abdominal muscles, which are essential for protection of the spine and back muscles. A day or two of rest after each workout is essential, and gradual safe build-up to full exercise regimes is critical.
Athletes and body builders, of course, have their own specialised regimes.
But all should avoid muscle-cannibalisation, and a popularly recommended method is drinking a whey protein isolate drink immediately after exercise or workout. (Much of the advice on exercise was sourced from Dr Joseph Mercola of US, although Mercola recommends whey protein concentrate rather than isolate… see end of article).
A personal perspective on good nutrition and exercise...
- Personally, I prefer a couple of egg yolks after resistance exercise. Also, four days a week I have only one meal each day, at evening. All my main meals consist of wild-caught fish and several vegetables, including at least one dark green leafy item.
- I avoid sugar, fruit juices, soft drinks, lollies, and processed foods. However, I get mildly drunk on Friday and Saturday nights... four quality beers and a bottle of organic Shiraz. (Ya gotta have a bit of fun or you turn into an unmitigated bore).
- I do remind readers I am not an expert of any kind. I am, however, unusually healthy for a 76 year old of 72 kilos body-weight. I bench press up to 50 kilos every two days and on alternative days, ride a bicycle up and down hills for half an hour, followed by Jake's Tower 200 resistance training for another half hour.
- Recently, a cardiologist found my resting heart rate to be 40 beats per minute. Akin to "a 25 year old olympic athlete in peak physical condition"... as an amused accompanying doctor observed. My body temperature is also 1.5 degress below normal. This clearly demonstrates that an ancient old fart like me can maintain sound health indefinitely. You, the reader, can follow suit with a fair degree of confidence.
- This good health might also seem to indicate my independent and unsponsored opinions on health do perhaps count for something. I also research for never less than 5 hours per day; more often for 8 -10 hours per day. Broad access to information is everything.
The human body has a special mechanism to warn us when more water is needed. The technical term for this is THIRST. If you do not experience thirst you do not need more water. The neurotic compulsion to lug bottles of water around has nothing to recommend it, but explanations abound:
The bottled water industry obviously benefits. However, the more we drink the more we ingest fluoride; which, it was pointed out by a recent Harvard University study, results in a 10% reduction in children’s IQ levels. Who knows the truth of this? However, many people are now using filters to remove fluoride, or obtaining their water elsewhere. The banning of fluoride movement is gaining momentum and fluoride has been banned in much of Europe, since 1954 due to the seven cancers it causes.
An genuine independent study in Australia would certainly put people’s minds at rest.
Australian dieticians and nutritionists appear to give advice that was considered suspect elsewhere three decades ago. The typical Health Department glossy photo of a glass of fruit juice, fruit galore, bread and cereals, and the recommendation to eat less meat and fat and worry about cholesterol could better be described as a visual suicide note.
Below, I have cherry-picked brief elements of advice provided by people who are not paid by lobbies. As in all information provided on these pages, I personally have no expert knowledge of my own and merely repeat what sounds like common sense. Correct me by all means (hundreds have already… causing this article to expand from three to sixteen pages).
Sugars: Avoid sucrose and fructose, and especially fruit juices, fruit syrups and soft drinks. Limit alcohol intake, especially spirits and beer. Avoid cheap beers. It is probably wise to limit alcohol consumption to 1-3 occasions per week.
Grains: If bread is rolled by steel it is virtually worthless as a food source, hence the premium stone-ground flour for healthy breads. However, there is ample evidence that in the past couple of thousand years wheat and other grains have been bred for markets rather than health. This has resulted in high levels of gluten to which many of us are dangerously allergic, but in fact this harms us all. Ancient grains such as spelt are favoured by health buffs. There is evidence that we would be wise to exclude all grains from our diets, with perhaps a little serving of oats with breakfast. Some experts even recommend against oats.
Most people absorb too much carbohydrate anyway. One food item containing carbohydrates per day should be adequate for all adults... sweet potatoes, potatoes, brown rice. Active children are somewhat self-regulating in this regard and carbs are absorbed and used. If kids are overweight it is wise to focus on exclusion of sugars, takeaway foods, and to facilitate exercise, before worrying about carbs.
Meat: The subject of meat versus vegetarianism is one that is invariably confused.
As always, we should harken back to our prehistory genesis:
- Carnivores have red bile and consume almost exclusively meat.
- Herbivores have green bile and eat exclusively vegetable matter.
- We humans are omnivores; that is, our bile is brown enabling us to absorb meats and vegetables and nuts.
- Moreover, our eyes, ears, and teeth are inarguably those of the hunter, set in the front of our heads; not of the hunted herbivores, which are to the side.
As the wise always say, keep as close to nature as you can and you can’t go far wrong. Go with nature, never against it.
We naturally eat meat and we can be sure our metabolism possesses innumerable cross-accommodations in this regard. Those who do not eat meat because they do not want to kill any living being are demonstrably short on logic. We kill micro-organisms every second of our lives. We kill insects, intentionally or otherwise. We kill the plants we eat (just because your ears have limited audio range, how do you know that lettuce does not scream as you eat it : ). Less whimsically, anyone our government kills does so in our name, and unless we publicly repudiate such actions we share the guilt.
Killing to eat or to survive is natural for humans and we need to put this into real-world perspective. There is a sharp difference between sensitivity and neurosis.
The real problem with meat is how it is produced. Pasture-fed beef and all lamb/mutton is safe. Feedlot meat / factory-farmed meat is not safe; in fact it is dangerous to consume because of the content of recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH), antibiotics, GM grains, and endemic disease. A legitimate ethical objection to meat is the way it is produced or killed.
Factory farming is the most outrageously cruel method of farming ever devised, with the sadism inflicted physically, emotionally, psychologically, and pathologically. Any person refusing to eat such meat product simply has a healthy conscience and respect for their own bodies. The same applies to halal and kosher (no difference) killing, which is also cruel and I believe should be banned in Australia.
We will not go into the related issue of live export, but this caused the closure of 150 abattoirs with the loss of 240,000 jobs; absolutely destroying entire regions of once-prosperous Australia. It has nothing to recommend it. (The history of live export can be read elsewhere on oziz4oziz.com/)
Milk: In Europe, people who rely on milk for their calcium and other vitamin content can purchase raw milk anywhere, including from street vending machines. In Australia the bulk milk industry controls the Department of Health and raw milk is illegal. Health Department official claims that raw milk is dangerous is not supported by the evidence, and in fact all dairy milk herds are tested regularly for disease, especially for bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis, and mastitis. (I was raised exclusively on raw milk as was most of my generation, and we are probably the healthiest generation in human history).
On the contrary, commercial milk is invariably the product of cows that are illegally fed a hormone (rBST or Posilac) that halves their lives and causes chronic mastitis. Fact: when you drink commercial milk you are also drinking a cocktail of pus, fat-growth hormones, and antibiotics, the latter of which will eventually expose us to the generation of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, and inevitably succumbing to global pandemics.
Pasteurisation destroys much of the nutritional benefit of milk and renders 47% of the calcium insoluble; which has enormous ramifications for people relying on dairy for their calcium intake and may go some way to explain the epidemic of osteoporosis; which is also due to deficiency of magnesium, potassium, phosphorous, manganese, copper, zinc and boron in arable soils because of chemical industry domination of agricultural practices. This can be surmounted by drinking raw milk and consuming bright-coloured organic vegetables and meat, plus a sprinkling of pink Himalayan salt. Raw milk also tends to correct gut flora and enhances the immune system, important information for weaned GAPS babies.
The same applies to dairy products. Because raw milk usually contains trace elements, but is hard to obtain, boron deficiency is common (typical of all NPK arable regime regions); which, it is claimed, causes the body to cannibalise calcium from teeth and bones. This can be remedied by adding a level teaspoon of borax to a litre of water, then adding one level teaspoon of this water/boron concentrate to a glass of water once or twice per week (more than this dose may reduce our ability to absorb magnesium, but we await confirmation in this regard). Meanwhile, it is interesting to read of the debate when mandatory pasteurisation was first mooted in 1938 http://editor.nourishedmagazine.com.au/articles/raw-milk-vs-pasteurized-milk
And then there is the fascinating comparison of calves, one raised on raw milk, the other on pasteurised http://thebovine.wordpress.com/2010/06/04/the-tale-of-two-calves-one-calf-got-raw-milk-the-other-pasteurized/ Read this horror story and consider the impact of pasteurised milk on a human infant.
For an article on the real contents of commercial milk http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/26/who-knew-this-cocktail-of-up-to-20-chemicals-was-in-your-glass-of-milk.aspx and Raw Milk Vs. Pasteurized Milk
Anti-disease foods: Many foods are particularly valuable in combating disease. Without going deeply into specifics: fresh ginger, fresh parsley, krill oil with astaxanthin, cinnamon, flax seed oil, chilli, turmeric, fermented vegetables (ie sourcraut), leafy dark-green vegetables, and cabbage are prominent amongst recommendations. Others are more specific remedies and your local health food shop can advise accordingly.
One drop of iodene per wek should eliminate this increasingly common deficiency. Do not rely on iodised salt.
Balanced diet: Recommendations: No processed foods and drinks, and no takeaways. But yes to sweet potatoes, green and other bright coloured vegetables, small fish, oily fish, organic eggs, lamb, pasture-fed beef, organic pork, pasture-fed chicken. Fruit off the tree, but in moderation. Alcohol once or twice per week only. Your vegetables should represent all the colours: red, green, yellow, orange, white; and fruit the same, but including the colours blue or purple.
One often hears it said that a treat now and then is fine, and ‘life is for living’, and ‘we deserve a bit of a break from time to time’. The problem is: the treat is more often now than then. We should measure each act of self-indulgence for what it is… capitulation and defeat and self-torture. Ultimately, suicide. The older we get, the higher the price for self-betrayal. Sadly, this is nature and nature can be savage.
Eyesight: Try to stare at distant trees, landscape features and wildlife for 15 minutes per day. As well as being restful and theraputic, this will exercise your eyes and defer age-caused vision deterioration by a couple of decades. Many eye infections can be remedied by simply washing eyes in sea water.
Consumer toxins: Use bland soaps, toothpastes and shampoos, especially avoiding the foaming component sodium laurel sulphpate. Avoid insecticides, pesticides, and herbicides (especially roundup/zero). Avoid anti-perspirants and deodorants, and sun screens. These invariably contain known carcinogens. Nicotinoids should also not be used as these are now definitely identified as the cause of bee population destruction.
MSG – a pervasive neurotoxin
Genetically modified foods: GM crops are banned in France, NZ, Russia, Germany, Ireland, Switzerland, Kenya, Madeira, Peru, and Japan. Bans on both cultivation and sale of GMOs are imposed in Austria, Hungary, Greece, Bulgaria and Luxembourg. Restrictions are currently being considered in UK and California. Studies in France, Russia, UK, and several other countries point to irreversible and serious organ damage to consumers, and expanding damage in successive generations. India is currently considering a nationwide ban of cultivation of all GM crops, pointing to undeniable harm to people and the economy, and to the more than 200,000 Indian farmers who have so far committed suicide because of Monsanto roundup-ready crop failures. Aussies will note with surprise than none of these bans rated a mention in the Murdoch media (and here we cynically include the ABC and SBS). If media publicity is to be believed, virtually all of Australia's scientists and academics support GM crops. Considering that most scientists are employed producing poisons or weapons, or in supporting environmental destruction, this is unsurprising.
The Australian Government and arrogant scientific community continue to ignore both the overwhelming evidence of GMO destruction and the 98% of Australians who do not want to consume GM foods without their knowledge and consent (RIED survey 2010). What is often not mentioned is the human and environmental harm caused by the glyphosate herbicide that is part of the GM crop management regime. Genetically Engineered Foods versus Organic Foods
and Russia says genetically modified foods are harmful: Voice of Russia
Sun: Get a light tan, and maintain it. This will protect against sunburn and possible skin cancer. At the very least, get ten minutes exposure per day to ensure your vitamin D levels are up. There is some evidence that foods high in astaxanthin promote development of deeper and more protective skin tan.
Cancer: I have recently discovered that there are some 19 cures for cancer that have been around for centuries, but are eschewed by western medicine because natural products cannot be patented and therefore extortionately marketed. I have viewed video evidence of a brain tumour in an infant, regarded by oncologists as inoperable, cured entirely in sixty days using Cannibus Oil. I have read about a young girl who had suffered from epileptic seizures at a rate of hundreds per day, being cured by a single dose of Cannibus Oil. I have personally witnessed a squamous cell carcinoma dissolved in 12 days, using Cansema (aka black salve augmented with DMSO).
Doctors do not tell their patients about competing treatments, preferring to refer for chemo, radiology, or surgery. These have a success rate of between 9% and 15%... but only for 20 years. After 20 years you will then probably die. Ergo, conventional medical methods are TREATMENTS ONLY. THEY DO NOT CURE.
At least two unconventional treatments actually cure cancers. I am currently seeking evidence about the efficacy of the other 17 methods.
I will leave it to the reader to decide if I am a gullible fool or otherwise, but I am now convinced that the medical profession and pharmaceutical industry are guilty of mass negligence resulting in injury and death. I am guessing that many are very aware of this but also realise that to permit objective research would result in lawsuits that would eliminate their entire industries and personal wealth. They rationalise that they owe it to their patients to prevent this from happening. All utterly altruistic, of course.
Finally, as in all of my writing, I urge readers to not believe what I say, but to entirely research for yourselves; then email me the results. Eventually, we will have a credible volume of evidence, one way or the other.
To those who say I have not persuaded them with my arguments, let me just say that it is not my intention to persuade anyone. Quite honestly, I do not care if you don't believe me. By all means, go and get every vaccine available. Scoff GMOs by the ton, along with processed foods, treated water, and hang onto your doctor's every word. And slip, slop, slap until you look like a snowman. I will chuckle at your well-earned demise.
Many readers will appreciate the reasons behind my recommendations and could probably venture many more themselves, salient issues in which evidence and common sense are at such variance to Government advice and regulations. One might very well ask the question: why?
The answer appears to be a combination of factors:
- Professional incompetence;
And behind it all,
- Agenda 21.
Agenda 21 is the modern presentation of the 1930s and 1940s goal of the Eugenics Society, which is run by the Rockefellers, Carnegies, Rothschilds, and other elite dynastic families. A recent convert was Bill Gates. After the bad name given to Eugenics by the Nazis, this philosophy's name was changed to Family Planning and similar titles; and rather than bluntly campaign for the killing and sterilisation of unwanted and “inferior” sections of humanity as they did before, this policy was couched in nicer terminology. Thus, vaccinations that incorporate sterilisation have been applied to various parts of the world. The rationale is the global population crisis, which is an intensely proselytised myth entirely created by the globalist/eugenics alliance.
In actual fact, it has been calculated that the entire population of the world, living in a home complete with yard, could fit into an area the size of Texas. The truth is there is plenty of room for us all to live, plenty of capacity for food, and the global population growth rate is currently slowing and is estimated to reverse by about 2050. Significantly, many countries have had below zero natural growth rates for quarter of a century or more, but this has been hidden by refugee intake, which itself has been stimulated by the very wars promoted by the same Rockefellers and Rothschilds.
Reportedly, in Brazil, thinking they were vaccinated against sexually transmitted disease, 40% of women have been sterilised without their knowledge or consent; 90% of these women are black. Thousands of men were forcibly sterilised in India. Bill and Melinda Gates are enthusiastic supporters of this movement and recently donated $10 billion to the deadly vaccination cause. Some bio scientists have expressed the opinion that certain new diseases bear the unmistakable signature of being man-made; AIDs being one of these. Other scientists acknowledge the manifest conspiracy, but nevertheless applaud.
The highly publicised population explosion myth ignores the prosaic reality that poverty forces people to have more children so that the surviving males can look after their parents in their old age. By introducing age pensions the population growth will go into reverse, as it has in every country in which an adequate age pension was introduced (ie in Australia, in 1946).
All such poverty is caused by corporations; the initial pattern dating back to the British East India Company’s colonisation of India five centuries ago. Highly successful Indian sub-continental agriculture and horticulture was erased to make way for cotton to feed the mills of Lancashire; a monoculture that destroyed soils. This has been the pattern worldwide and continues today, with soy, corn, cotton, palm oil, and rice. Essentially, wealth is stolen, food resources and cultures of reciprocity eliminated; and ecosystems laid waste; and once self-sustaining family rural enterprise destroyed and replaced with corporate low wage exploitation and even slavery.
As for food shortages, apart from droughts, which occur periodically and naturally all around the world, the main cause is manipulation of food distribution and price; practices run by the same corporations (Monsanto, Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland, Bunge, Continental Grain, et al) and owned by the same globalist elites. They also own our governments by paying for politician’s and party’s election campaigns and by controlling the media (Murdoch). They also control the United Nations, which they created (the HQ of which is on Rockefeller land in NY), and almost all universities and think tanks.
The only effective opposition to this in the world today is the Occupy Movement, which is now in 83 countries. The host of this article, oziz4oziz.com/ is an integral part of this movement but preceded Occupy by several years as the Australia’s Tariff Restoration Bloc (TRB), with very politically disparate membership, including the Australian Independents Alliance, which was betrayed by the politicians it was created for.
Dr Joseph Mercola of the US, is acknowledged as a dominant influence on conclusions reached, and in providing direction for research. Our thanks.
Mercola.com Health Resources, LLC ll Rights Reserved.