AUSTRALIA'S BURNING ISSUES
THE IMMIGRATION QUESTION
By Tony Ryan
The current conversation about immigration and acceptability levels focuses on ideology, global relativity, complementation of the national skills pool, and preferred origin of immigrants; and inexplicably ignores elephantine core criteria… water, food, and accommodation.
Australia has sufficient water resources to support the current population providing drought regimes do not intensify. Many climate experts suggest they will.
Speaking from the vantage point of cheerful ignorance, many politicians call volubly for capture of northern wet season rains; oblivious to the coastal flatness of the north, the porous nature of ambient geology, massive tropical evaporation rates, and the daunting amount of high-cost energy required to pump this water to areas of need should it actually be captured.
Meanwhile, central eastern Australia, the Murray-Darling basin, is in perennial water crisis, and talk of desalination and recycling ignores toxic heavy metal retention and very high cost.
On the issue of water alone, any additional immigration is prohibitive.
Few Australians seem aware that only 4% of our continent comprises arable soils. Our food security has always been in the balance; increasingly so as developers unconscionably gobble up outer urban arable land, which is always the most productive.
Compliments of free trade ideology, domestic food production has been decimated and much arable land upon which national food security relies has been turned over to export monocultures and non-food crops such as cotton (which also injures national water security).
Not only does this make Australia vulnerable to future food ransom, as famously alluded to by Henry Kissinger, ruthless land management practices are destroying our arable soils with inappropriate cultivation; chemical fertilisers which kill essential soil bacteria; and the endemic monocultural failure to fallow and rotate crops.
This damage, according to emeritus professor Henry Nix will, in the very near future, injure our arable land beyond realistic repair.
Clearly, our food production and inadequate water resources already delimit immigration. By my calculation, we have already reached our optimum population level.
But, in any event, where would we find the accommodation for more immigrants? Thanks to the corporate profit-led deregulation which free trade policies have demanded, foreign buy-up of homes and land has driven accommodation prices beyond reach of anyone on fixed or otherwise low incomes.
So, yes, we should welcome any immigrants who are independently wealthy and who bring their own soil and water.
THE GREAT SUPER ROBBERY
By Tony Ryan
What may prove to be John Howard’s most infamous legacy, was his insurance/superannuation industry dip ‘n’ rip scheme in which insurance corporations were enabled to install multiple life insurance policies on superannuant’s savings without their knowledge or consent.
Theoretically, the poor victims might have up to 21policy premiums deducted from their super accumulations over a period of three years; totaling $14,700. For workers who have several different employers per year (ie fruit pickers, shearers, contractors, seasonal workers, gardeners, decorators, performers), this could go on for decades.
Such workers are not notably astute in such matters because basic education is conveniently in decline; they are perennially tired and, anyway, they trust government and institutions to do the right thing. Never missing a trick, politicians love to quote this phrase as their alibi mantra.
The victims will never know about their loss until they retire, or receive a notice advising them their super savings account is empty.
I discovered this government-sanctioned racket quite by accident, and was also fortunate in that one insurance company worker, experiencing terrible feelings of complicity guilt; spilled the beans to me, as they say in the detective comics.
I had promised to do something about this crime, which possibly harmed a million or so Aussie workers, but I had little trust in The System that facilitated such robbery. I had already demanded explanations from the relevant corporations, to no avail, so my next hopeful step was then Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd. Unsurprisingly, I drew a dud from Rudd.
Next, I wrote to the Treasurer, Wayne Swan. What was I thinking?
Finally, four months later, Senator Nick Sherry wrote to me with soothing words about superannuation and insurance companies caring about we Aussie workers. It was then I finally realised I risked irking the wink ‘n’ nudge finance and investment industry which operates within a judicially immune bubble.
Together, I concluded, along with the Big Four Banks, they are untouchable.
That was way back in 2008. I also witnessed Rudd and his economic impetus strategy in which every citizen received $900 which, so predictably, they used to reduce credit card debt or mortgages… an exercise which tangentially bailed out the Big Four Banks for losses incurred under the GFC. This was taxpayer bailout by stealth.
I could not help but laugh when Rudd claimed our very own Big Four had suffered no losses whatsoever, even though they were privately so broke they were unable even to loan to each other. Great Super Robbery followed by Great Bank Bailout by Taxpayer Con, I thought whimsically.
So that was that.
I think that was when I grasped the essential principles here: Little crimes, lotsa cops. Big crimes, no cops.
Then, a decade later, arrived the Royal Commission into banks, and finance, and miscellaneous robberies in between.
So, this is finally my turn to spill the beans.
Such a pity the Royal Commissioner has refused to accept evidence; which makes it easier for him to delimit injury to the callous insurance corporations.
CATCH ‘N’ CAN THE CRIM$
CRUCIAL OUTCOMES OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO THE BANKING AND FINANCE INDUSTRY
By Tony Ryan
The Royal Commission, if it is to cure Australia’s financial and investment regulation ills, must recommend ALL key elements of the cure:
- Firstly, as a matter of urgency, Parliament approve substantial prison sentences for offences above $1000 injury to clients, especially wherein victims were of low income or were otherwise relatively defenseless. Mandatory prosecutions and retroactive sentences must be applied or the entire regulatory exercise becomes futile. Fines are laughed at by the wealthy.
- Establishment of an Office of the Supreme Regulator, which ensures that the ACCC and ASIC and other finance and investment industry regulators do their job in a manner which meets the regularly surveyed expectations of the Australian people.
- Establishment of a People’s Bank, modeled on that which was the Commonwealth Bank before privatisation.
- Expulsion of the Rothschild’s Swiss-based Bank for International Settlements as the employer of staff of the Reserve Bank of Australia, including the position of Governor of the RBA. And, of course, transferal of the RBA to the new people’s bank.
- Separation of the UK’s Hill Simon Bank from Macquarie Bank and other similar piggy-back foreign investments.
- Expulsion of all foreign bank components of Australian banks and the introduction of mandatory shop-front statements of ownership.
- Scrapping of the current method of economic macro-analysis, which primarily recognises as criteria, only conditions for the wealthy; and subsequent adoption of a new model which primarily benchmarks the prosperity of the poorest Australians.
- Establishment of an independent commission which solely records the accurate status of employment, underemployment and unemployment of Australia’s workers.
Adoption of these reforms will ensure that finance, investment, and banking industries; and concomitant economic measuring devices, are conducted with accuracy and honesty.
Currently, this is not the case. The finance, investment, banking, superannuation, and conjoint insurance industries operate in what amounts to a judicial immunity bubble, wherein major crime is rampant. Politically enabling such lassitude is that all Australian economic and financial overview by government is seriously distorted by mythical unemployment figures which downwardly-misrepresent reality by 800%. This is known by around 60% of Australians as “The Great Lie”.
This carefully constructed economic propaganda machine was the first vehicle upon which the vast criminal financial and economic misrepresentation network was established. Both the LNP and ALP desperately protect the ‘great lie’ because to do otherwise would be to admit that free trade has destroyed Australian manufacturing and, with it, the Australian economy.
This was first suspected by arch-editor Max Walsh, then editor of the highly respected Newsweek-Bulletin, which in 1999 surveyed the nation and found that unemployment even then was 23%. This rising trend was independently confirmed every three years from 2001… ( ref oziz4oziz.com/ ).
A few years ago, in an interview hurriedly shut down and denied by ABCTV, a demographer pointed out that one in four Australian workers has no job at all, and another one in four has only inadequate part time work.
Other independent researchers calculate that homelessness affects three million Australians. This is a far cry from the 300,000 claimed by Government, or the “Era of Unprecedented Prosperity” and 3.4% unemployment megahorned by John Howard.
The current 4.6% claim by the LNP’s Scott Morrison is an exercise in providing plausible variability to enhance the lie. If the Australian government actually represented the Australian people, instead of the wealthy and powerful and foreign-corporations; such a massive lie would attract decades-long prison sentences.
Such an aspiration is unrealistic in the current level of saturation political corruption but it will surely happen following sufficient emergence of people-power independents and political parties; and expulsion of the foreign Murdoch-led media duopoly.
GOVERNMENT BY SHAREHOLDER
By Tony Ryan
Ever since Paul Keating and John Howard transported reluctant Australians from the egalitarian prosperity of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s era, into an unprecedented era of unemployment, underemployment, poverty, and homelessness; 85% of the Australian People have been quietly disqualified and rendered invisible as citizens.
For our own good, of course. The Governing Class, aka former ruling class, require us to understand that we have neither the knowledge nor wisdom to offer judgements to government. And we can be assured that this event of elitist paternalism will be celebrated in history as Australia's Second Era of Transportation... this time to financial oblivion rather than to colonies.
The surviving chosen demographic... shareholders... now described more prosaically as mums & dads, especially when it came to selling the first half of Telstra (which, to their eternal regret, most now prehistoric Aussies hotly opposed).
Since Citizen of Australia reidentification, unemployment is now able to be gauged variably at 6%, which hides the otherwise awkward 50% had the workers and other unwanted demographics been included in the count. And Redefinition enabled John Howard to describe his era as one of unprecedented prosperity.
Actually, if truth be known, the Great Mining Boom was more of a Great Media Microphone Boom, as journalists jettisoned news in favour of politician’s press releases and propaganda opportunities; and they entirely forgot to mention that mining at its peak was 0.3% less contributing to GDP than the dying manufacturing sector (8.6% versus 9%).
Nevertheless, shareholders… oops, Mums & Dads… were indeed making money. And some had to pay tax, so Canberra had at least a tiny injection into Consolidated Revenue. These shareholders are somewhat resentful that Howard’s Double Taxation Act ruled that corporations which pay tax in other countries do not have to pay tax in Australia; which shifts the burden to them. Now that is unfair.
The Invisibles (ie us) with half unemployed or scraping by with part time work, or on welfare, had little to contribute to the dear old income tax department which, of course, is why Canberra’s coffers are near empty.
Government programmes must now be funded by loans, the interest of which profits the Leading Shareholders, whom we will salute later.
Those who ridiculed the GST should by now appreciate the genius behind this replacement of income tax, because it ensures everybody contributes to politician’s pension funds and mining development grants, whether they have full time jobs or not.
There is some lingering doubt about the wisdom of managing a national economy on the presumption that shareholders are tangibly productive people, or that they apply values such as national interest, health and education, into decision-making.
Listening to Scott Morrison, I am reassured that only the very wealthy and knowledgeable Leading Shareholders: the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Murdochs, and the Lowys; will noticeably be influencing government in the future.
We know this is a good thing because we are told this by the media, which is owned by the Leading Shareholders.
MANAGING WASTE AND RECYCLING… GET REAL
By Tony Ryan
While the nation anguishes over the vast problems of waste management and recycling, one might be forgiven for regarding this as a deliberate and well-engineered distraction.
Which, by the way, it is.
The real decision to be made is… just when do we tell manufacturers, distributors and retailers that henceforth they can longer pack their products with wrapping.
The reason they do not want this conversation to emerge is that wrapping is cheaper then employing workers to serve you in shops.
I, like a million other Australians, well-remember the days when rubbish was collected once per week, in bins half the size of the current wheelie and, moreover, even these were seldom more than half-full.
Why was this?
First, and most obvious, pre-wrapping and packing was non-existent in those far-off days. If our meat, or fish, or cheese needed wrapping, this was done with butcher’s paper at the point of sale. Post-consumption, both the vegetable peelings and paper were dug into our gardens as organic fertilizer and organic mulch.
There were no plastics; only glass jars and bottles. And most of these were recyclable. Often, the kids had already cashed these in at the local store, which was just up the street.
Metal cans were indeed used but these were for baked beans or sardines; and there were only two or three of these opened per week.
The only reason we do not immediately return to the sensible and environmentally intelligent solutions of yesteryear is that the grocery duopoly, and the importers of foreign goods, view this as a threat to their illicit profits.
Because these entities have more influence on our political representatives than do we; and because they are the primary source of media advertising revenue; this conversation is not happening.
Nevertheless, a genuine solution must be adopted now. Plastic containers are pumping pseudo-estrogens into men and boys, turning them into sterile and quasi-feminine blobs with boobs. And, wrapping and packing is swamping our environment… at massive cost to the economy and to environmental health.
Even more alarming, this is destroying our oceans and even the fish that we eat. The oceans are the crucible of all life on this planet.
Obviously, with many homes too tiny to permit gardens, which once absorbed domestic organic waste, it will not be difficult to have this locally collected for conversion to fertilizer and mulch for produce farmers.
There are two paths to resolution:
On a bi-partisan basis, politicians must establish a fully independent Federal Commission to immediately install binding regulatory legislation, with serious terms of imprisonment for abusers and defaulters;
Politicians and the guilty parties can anticipate a violent backlash from the community. That this will happen is one of the lessons of history, and the only variable factor is when.
I am a parent
By Tony Ryan
Fifty years ago, parents held a position in the community that was respected and unassailable.
It was understood by all that parents held the future in their arms and that family was the sole nurturer of future generations. No individual or sector of the community dared question the supremacy of PARENTS as the backbone of the societal body.
The community at large understood that parents provided the love, affection, and nurturing that produced fulfilled and productive future adults, the only exceptions being the merging cadre of medical and psychiatric professionals who viewed 'Family' as restrictive competition. In 1973, global garment and pop music corporations joined this attack, perceiving parents as barriers to the lucrative youth market.
Today, in terms of the universal values of thousands of years, parenting is a dying skill. Many children are not receiving the attention they need to grow to maturity and exercise the drive and self-discipline needed to survive in the adult world. Literacy and numeracy skills have fallen, with one third of children unable to cope with job learning demands.
Why is this happening and who are the entities responsible?
With the emergence of the 20th century a trend commenced in which medical doctors claimed parenting expertise, with no evidence whatsoever they had the prerequisite knowledge or skills but, nevertheless, they enjoyed a growing power as lobbyists of governments.One outspoken politician described the Australian Medical Association (AMA) as the nation's most powerful trade union. Others bestow the less polite mantle of Medical Mafia, which has a total monopoly on pharmaceuticals, antibiotics, invasive interventions, and claimed cures.
An authoratarian mandate of families was just another market to conquer.
Perhaps the most destructive of these family interventionists was John B Watson, US psychologist, who claimed infants were harmed by love and affection, and he held that babies’ nappies should be changed on a cold marble slab and with no verbal expressions of love or affection.Sir Frederick Truby King
With the specialisation of paediatricians came new demands that babies be fed artificial milk formulas and by rigid clock schedules, every four hours.
The cow milk industry successfully conjoined with doctors to present breast milk as primitive and inadequate. Thousands of babies died from the effects of watered-down or toxic milk, and millions suffered bowel issues for the rest of their lives.
Mothers were vulnerable to this destructive advice because their own families were often long distances away from the towns where their husbands worked.
Meanwhile, doctors and nurses colonised the birthing process, further disempowering mothers. The birthers of millennia, midwives, were rigidly controlled by doctors who were invariably ill-equipped for the role. Fathers were alienated from the birthing process.
Thus it was that parent’s roles were hijacked from the onset of each child’s life.
The 1970s saw a campaign by school teachers to receive higher status and pay, which resulted in the closing down of dedicated teacher’s training colleges and replacement of classroom skills with university education.
The UN weighed in heavily but discreetly and the central message imparted to undergraduate teachers was that they were the intelligentsia and parents were rendered obsolete by a new wave of knowledge and social demands.
Essentially, they were told, it is their role to sever the intergenerational transfer of knowledge. Children were taught to disregard parental values and parental discipline came under severe attack, especially by the teacher’s allies, social workers, psychologists, and sociologists.
By the 1980s children were being encouraged to report their parents to welfare for child abuse… the new euphemism for parental discipline.
Parents who grounded their rebellious teenagers for entering licensed premises and discos had their children confiscated by social workers and were refused access to them.
In one instance in Darwin, clearly abusive parents, who had been spanking a 6 month old baby, and who had suffered a skull fracture and haemorrhaging buttocks, were supported by social workers.
Clearly, the inmates had taken over the asylum.
Following WWII, the Christian denominations realised that many children were orphaned and many pregnant women had lost their husbands and boyfriends. This was seen as a marvelous opportunity to harvest little souls and so orphanages flourished.
Not content with the supply of war-time orphans, the churches harassed mother-to-be to give their babies up for adoption, and then commenced stealing children who had been placed into temporary care because of the post-war scarcity of accommodation.
In UK, Margaret Humphries uncovered the thefts of 65,000 children, their parents having been told they were dead. These children were sold into slavery in Rhodesia, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
In Australia, 2000 neglected part-Aboriginal children, and others that Christians claimed were “at risk”, were also herded into Christian orphanages. Margaret Humphries calculated that, regardless of ethnicity 20% of all children in Christian care were sexually abused.
Clearly, this was the most extreme attack on parents and children. Demonstrating the collapse of justice in Australia, and the power these organisations wield, these religious abusers have never been required to compensate their victims; this being borne by the long-suffering taxpayer.
In the 1970s, global corporations realised that penetration of the youth market was seriously hindered by parental influence. With their alliance with the now corporatising public media (this relationship sealed by the corporate advertising which paid for media), the role of parenting became the target of subtle ridicule, especially through television sitcoms and Hollywood movies. The impact was measurable through the rapidly diminishing level of respect that children and teenagers held for parents and the elderly.
While corporations were attacking parenting, those in IT industries were presenting their products as essential to any kind of normal life. This attitude was promoted and constituted emotional blackmail to force parents to buy their kids increasingly sophisticated and expensive mobile phones and computers, even at the expense of nutritious food.
Then came social media and the addiction to these by children of all ages. Children became even more alienated from the parents and began to suffer sleep deprivation as they tuned into Facebook late into the night.
As if that were not destructive enough, bullying at school, facilitated by the ludicrous hands-off attitudes of principals, was added to by online bullying.
The corporations providing these services prevent governments from instituting the obvious solutions of banning such IT elements from schools and young children.
Parents are forced to permit their children to access online by the schools themselves.
It is not widely recognised that the United Nations was designed by Nelson Rockefeller in the 1930s as a conduit for his global corporatisation ambitions and, indeed, the UN headquarters building was built on Rockefeller land in New York.
This campaign, promoted by the UN components: the World Trade Organisation, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund, we now know of a Globalisation, featuring free trade ideology, which in turn was promulgated to all students in universities through the efforts of UNESCO.
Free trade enabled giant corporations to use cheap and slave labour of the third world to undermine national manufacturing, which traditionally fed 80% of all employment. Over a period of forty-five years Australian unemployment went from below 1% to 25%; and workers on inadequate part time work made up another quarter of the work force.
This led to paranoid workers doing an average of 9 hours unpaid work per week to ensure their continued employment. This, plus the time wasted going from workplace to workplace, absorbed much of the time previously allocated to parenting.
The pressures of poverty causes accelerated marital breakup and widespread homelessness; now affecting three million Australians.
Feminists of the 1960s demanded equal pay for equal work and equal access to the workforce and surveys showed that 99% of men thought this stance to be eminently reasonable.
In 1973, the media, led by Rupert Murdoch, who was by now into alliance with David Rockefeller and his Trilateral Commission, began ignoring moderate feminists in favour of aggressive man-hating radicals.
This new feminism, supported by the media, was able to reject half of humanity, diminished and reviled the role of traditional mothers; and promoted affirmative action and female quotas. This had the effect of causing the loss of breadwinner jobs, which in turn delivered marriage break-ups and a rising tide of male suicides.
Once again, families suffered and parenting was even more eroded.
At some undefined point judicial activism made itself felt; most evident in the feminist orientated Family Law Court, resulting in fathers being almost erased from the parenting equation when marriages broke up.
Whilst women were commonly recipients of Supporting Mothers Benefits (later retitled SPB) and simultaneously receiving support payments from their former husbands, many were also enjoying part time jobs and support from new boyfriends.
Meanwhile, former husbands were homeless, bereft of a survivable income, and denied access to their children viz viz feminist accusations of violence and abuse. This fed another surge in suicides. Many refused to work, in protest.
Parenting had been dealt yet another blow.
As another component of globalisation, and once again sponsored by the United Nations through the creation of local government associations, the accountable role of town clerk was abandoned in favour of the unilateral and unaccountable position of CEO.
This triggered rapid rises in rates and the savage imposition of regulations which were blatant revenue-raising.
In both urban and rural environments these higher costs further ground family budgets into financial oblivion.
In 1970, David Rockefeller assumed the mantle of the Rockefeller dynasty and his first move was to commission Zbigniew Brzezinski, a leading architect of the gold war, to create the biggest ever Military-Industrial-Intelligence facility: the Trilateral Commission.
This was completed in 1973 and Rockefeller then sponsored Australian media mogul Rupert Murdoch to join the Rockefeller/Rothschild Investment Banker Alliance.
This merger eventually resulted in Murdoch owning 70% of Australian media and with editorial control of all of it, including ABC and SBS.
With control of the media this also meant control of election campaigns, enabling Murdoch and his associate Frank Lowy, to control the major political parties and, thence, the Australian Government.
This meant that the truth about the Australian economy could be hidden from the national electorate. Thus, 50% unemployment / underemployment could successfully be presented as 6% unemployment.
The implications for parenting were that half of Australia’s parents were living in poverty, half of these divorced or separated, and the remainder living in terror of joining the unemployed.
This was no climate for successful parenting.
So, how do we reclaim the parenting role under terms acceptable to the parent community?
There is no one answer. Simultaneously, several national reforms must take place:
- Australia’s media monopoly must be broken up, foreign ownership expelled, and all media subjected to volunteer editorial regulatory councils in each community.
- Australia must readopt democracy, which in contemporary terms means that the community must formulate government policies. We need to jettison the appalling fraud of government by experts and lobbies, and enable the electorate to determine its own future.
- Politician’s roles need to be reduced to listening posts for the community. The idea that these painfully ordinary people can do our thinking for us is ludicrous. We need to absorb the reality that 99.99% of all knowledge, intelligence, wisdom, and goodwill resides outside of government… in other words, in the national electorate. The electorate can select one of a range of survey forms with check lists to allocate budget priorities and policy direction options.
- Foreign corporations and lobbies need to be silenced.
- Media election campaigns need to be outlawed.
- Political donations must be banned.
THE VACCINE/AUTISM CONTROVERSY
By Tony Ryan
This article does not seek to dissuade the reader from being vaccinated, but to provide frustrated truth-seekers with information that is never permitted to appear in the public media. The author’s attitude is that if people are gullible enough to believe the propaganda of the sickness industry, they thoroughly deserve the outcomes.
The author claims no qualifications or expertise other than a willingness to undertake the arduous research of those who are in fact qualified and who have also demonstrated intelligence, competence and integrity. This, in the author’s opinion, disqualifies around 95% of ‘health professionals’ and, most certainly, all politicians and ‘health’ bureaucrats.
The history of Autism goes back only 84 years.
- In 1933, autism was unheard-of.
- In 1934, the first case of autism was encountered. This occurred months after public vaccination regimes commenced.
- Fifty years ago, with vaccination regimes much-expanded, the occurrence of autism was declared one in 10,000.
- Now in Australia autism is reported as one in sixty-seven; and in the US, one in fifty? The exponential increase has exactly paralleled the expansion of vaccination regimes.
- Independent studies showed that unvaccinated populations* experience no autism at all.
*Two independent studies into the 300,000 population of Amish in the US recorded only two cases of autism and these were in children of one family who had spent time away from the Amish community and were vaccinated by non-Amish relatives.
Autism and other vaccine injuries are clearly a serious global phenomenon, one that is injuring and even killing millions of babies and infants. One would routinely expect all governments to spare no expense or effort to urgently identify the cause or causes, and the remedy. Yet not one government is doing this, except to fund research to prove the pandemic is not caused by vaccinations.
Something is very wrong here.
The entire point of government is to protect The People from exploitation and oppression by the powerful. Yet here we are, with governments and the media protecting the medical / pharmaceutical monopoly from public scrutiny.
Moreover, governments are punishing citizens who question the validity of medical practices, which easily-available evidence demonstrates are harmful to children.
Doctors who support these citizens and who duly recognise that the contra-indication evidence cannot be repudiated; are vilified and ridiculed, and many have lost their licences.
When governments repress evidence or wrongdoing and death, to any normal human being, this can only be described as absolute corruption.
However, in jurisdictions where outcomes are regulated solely by evidence, and I refer here to law courts, the outcome is very different.
Court actions in UK, Italy, Sweden, India, Nepal, Hungary, France, the US and other nations have proved instances of injury caused by the following vaccines: polio, mumps, measles, MMR (combo measles, mumps, rubella), H1N1 swine flu, seasonal flu, tetanus (the tetanus/diphtheria/pertussis combo vaccine), and varicella (chicken pox), and the new HPP (Gardasil cervical cancer vaccine with 39 US deaths); while the Australian Government and Australian Medical Association posture inexplicably that such risk either does not exist or is so low as to be of negligible concern.
It is routinely claimed by authorities that the cause of autism is essentially unknown, but is probably of genetic origin. Given the exponential explosion of incidence over 84 years from a position of no cases at all, one thing we can presume for an absolute certainty is that genetics plays no causal part in autism and any claim that it is a gross insult to our intelligence. (Nonetheless, doctors have been routinely insulting our intelligence for decades and with remarkable success; aided by prolific film and TV public relations creations).
The doctor/pharmaceutical/government alliance (known to healthy cynics as the Sickness Industry) has also told us there is no known cure for autism. Read on and learn what consummate and unconscionable liars these people are.
UK neurologist, Dr Natasha Campbell-McBride, following through on the research of fellow-national Dr Andrew Wakefield, was one of those who made a breakthrough when she cured her own child of autism largely through reintroducing gut flora.
I have viewed a video in which a tearful mother told us that her teenage son had just looked her in the eye for the first time in his life and said “I love you Mum”. This is the impact of Campbell-McBride’s therapies and treatments, cures that desperate parents of autistic children would probably kill for, but are denied to them by doctors who place profits above patients.
What follows in the next few paragraphs is, for the sake of brevity, my own interpretation of Campbell-McBride’s and others’ experience and research results:
A pattern appears to have emerged that vaccinations interfere with the natural development of children’s immune systems leading to new chronic infections: typically tonsil, adenoid, and ear infections; but also chronic diarrhoea (initiated by lack of protective gut flora, and then again exacerbated by repeatedly prescribed antibiotics and vaccines). These were conditions which emerged following introduction of vaccines, most especially MMR.
The complex sequence of multi-sourced attacks appears to be as follows:
1. Since the introduction of the contraceptive pill, which is now thought to compromise gut flora, thus-effected women appear to pass on this deficiency to their female babies; who grow up to pass on a more enhanced gut flora deficiency (Gut and Psychological Syndrome… GAPS) in their own children; and so on. This is believed to be intergenerationally cumulative. Such babies, especially if not breastfed are highly susceptible to infections.
Babies harvest gut and skin flora in the birth canal and, therefore, Caesarean babies do not receive this critical benefit. Breastfed babies receive their second launching of their immune system from initial breast milk, and this quality is self-modifying over the breast-feeding period. (Breastfed babies become susceptible when breastfeeding ceases, which is why breast feeding for four years is recommended; but bottle-fed babies suffer from birth).
Because they have yet to develop an immune system, GAPS babies are incapable of benefiting from vaccines (some opinion has it that no baby less than two years old can benefit from vaccines, period… a thought which makes absolute sense). Worse, many vaccines contain genetically modified viruses with unknown effects (incorporated in the vaccine purely to enable patenting by the pharmaceutical corporations).
2. Routinely, as infections or symptoms occur, doctors prescribe antibiotics and the consequential further or complete elimination of gut flora exposes the child to atypical infections while simultaneously depressing normal immune system development. One strain of atypical bacteria tends to form an exclusive and dominant colony and produces a toxin that damages parts of both the cranial and enteric nervous systems; and sometimes the extent of this damage is exacerbated by other factors (3 & 4).
3. Brain and nerve damage is also influenced by the kind of adjuvants used in vaccines, particularly, it would seem, glutamate, mercury, aluminium and formaldehyde; which appear to independently cause brain damage of their own, hardly surprising considering mercury is the second most toxic element after uranium; and glutamate is the substance that regulates early brain development, influenced by the overall immune system (see Dr Blaylock link… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUCCdCecLTo&feature=BFa&list=PLA77C01EF916264F7
4. Common and (in this context) highly toxic vaccine adjuvants and additives are: aluminium, monosodium glutamate, sodium phosphate, phenoxyethanol, gelatin, sulphites, yeast protein, antibiotics, RNA and DNA from animal and human tissue cultures, squalene, ethyl glycol (anti-freeze), triton disinfectant, phenol, and polysorbate 80. Additional chemicals implicated in autism are preservatives 280 and 283. Many of these are extremely toxic in minute doses and at least two of these seriously retard or stop infant brain development, so why are these substances used in medical treatments for babies and children and pregnant women?
There is one very obvious answer: because they are cheaper adjuvants than the expensive alternatives. This then is partly about profit. These multi-sourced interactive attacks on the brain and nervous system tend to explain the wide spectrum of autism manifestations; possibly exacerbated by aspartame, food MSG and, without doubt, by bottle-feeding of babies (all legal dairy milk contains rBST).
5. A fourth series of effects can be sourced in the active component of the vaccine itself. The polio vaccine administered in India has so far caused 47,000 cases of paralysis, inexplicably dubbed non-polio paralysis by typically dishonest medical scientists.
6. A fifth cumulative or even primary concern is contaminants in vaccines. Jonas Salk himself admitted in a video interview that there were 37 contaminants in his polio vaccine, ranging from animal protein to pathogen particles. (Having explained this he cackled insanely, and then died).
Autism is not the only issue of contention.
Claimed vaccine efficacy itself has been a fraud. Objective research of two centuries of disease incidence reveals that all of the diseases claimed to be reduced or eliminated by vaccines, had declined dramatically long before vaccine programmes were established (ie small pox et al); largely due to improved public nutrition, personal hygiene, and treatment of injuries. The claims by the pharmaceutical corporations and medical industry are bogus. Immunization-Graphs-Complete.pdf (application/pdf Object) and
The high percentage of already vaccinated disease victims demonstrates the vaccines simply do not work (ie pertussis and tetanus).
Some vaccines actually cause disease. Chicken pox vaccine, for example, causes previously unknown childhood shingles, more dangerous and infinitely more painful than the original childhood disease.
Objective analysis of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) also reveals vaccination to be the cause.
The most immediate logical conclusion is that all suspect vaccines should be immediately taken off the market.
This is my only recommendation, one that government has ignored for seven years now…
Each government should immediately establish an independent and transparent research facility to examine the short and long term effects of all pharmaceutical and commercial products that are ingested by humans.
Vaccines that do not work, or that cause disease, or pose high risk of autism or Guillain-Barre Syndrome (H1N1 swine flu vaccine) must be condemned and discontinued.
Currently, almost all safety checking is done by the pharmaceutical corporations themselves and all of it is very short term (ie a few weeks rather than years).
Australia and NZ’s reliance on America’s FDA is naïve in the extreme, or as many would say, cynical, considering how many FDA executives have career origins in the pharmaceutical corporations they are purported to regulate.
Antibiotics should always be followed by restoration of gut flora; which might prove vexing as 70% of all antibiotics used are for animal feed: ie factory farming, feedlot farming, and for dairy cows milked other than for raw milk.
Observations from the article source region of Arnhem Land, NT.
It might well be noted that Australia’s Aborigines in the northern states (NT and Kimberly) receive more such antibiotics and vaccinations than any comparable group in the world, and that because of deficient diet, largely reliant on processed foods and takeaways, plus vast consumption of sugars and carbohydrates, this has had undoubted implications for Aboriginal health; inviting pointed questions about the number of deaths due to cancer of the liver and other organs.
Aboriginal cultural insistence on breastfeeding for two to four years has probably blurred if not obviated much incidence of autism, but cessation upon the birth of the next sibling would go a long way to explaining later learning difficulties. There are so many factors responsible for brain damage and impaired brain development among traditional Aborigines that it is hard to differentiate between other causes and autism, or combinations of both.
Of probable validity is the observation that the two sickest populations in the western world are Americans and Australian Aborigines of the North; which also happen to be the two most vaccinated populations on this planet.
Potentially harmful seasonal flu vaccinations
Data collected from Canada and Hong Kong during 2009-2010 showed that people who received the seasonal flu vaccine in 2008 had twice the risk of getting the H1N1 “swine flu,” compared to those who hadn't received a flu shot.
“While these initial findings were largely disputed by the pharmaceutical industry, new research confirms the link between the flu vaccination and an increased risk of more serious bouts of pandemic illness.
Moreover, there are major differences between naturally-acquired immunity and vaccine-induced immunity. With vaccination, you are creating an antibody, but as recent research has confirmed, unvaccinated children naturally build up more antibodies against a wider variety of flu virus strains than vaccinated children. “(Quote: Dr Joseph Mercola, US).
(As above) Data collected from Canada and Hong Kong during 2009-2010 showed that people who received the seasonal flu vaccine in 2008 had twice the risk of getting the H1N1 “swine flu,” compared to those who hadn't received a flu shot – Mercola. Flu Vaccine Increases Risk of Serious Pandemic Flu Illness
Swedish children struck down by vaccine-induced narcolepsy. Narcolepsy traced to specific vaccine batches - The Local
The UN’s WHO-declared Grade 6 H1N1 pandemic turned out to be milder than most seasonal flus, and the subsequent untested vaccination carried more disadvantages than it offered protection. But this was not the only problem to emerge from this debacle: According to new research published in JAMA, the more children are exposed to per fluorinated compounds (PFCs), the less likely they are to have a good immune response to vaccinations. The finding suggests that these chemicals can affect children’s immune system enough to make them more vulnerable to infectious diseases. More Evidence That Flu Vaccines Are Worthless
Inadequate testing of flu vaccines exposes efficacy weaknesses, especially in respect of the aged. Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis: The Lancet Infectious Diseases
The deaths of four infants in Nepal within three hours of receiving measles vaccines has drawn fresh attention to inadequate reporting systems that mask many times more deaths. As one of the first courageous doctors to blow the whistle on fraudulent medical practices, Dr Joseph Mercola, observes: A quick search of America’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) 2 reveals nearly 5,100 vaccine-related deaths have been reported in the U.S between 1990 and August 2012, as of this writing. The vast majority of deaths – nearly 60 percent – occurred in children under the age of three. Just over 360 of the reported vaccine-associated deaths in the US have been related to any of the measles-containing vaccines.
With adverse event information on over 70 vaccines included in the VAERS database, it is a phenomenal tool that can help you easily identify which vaccines are significantly associated with specific side effects. It is important to know, though, that what is included in VAERS is only a tiny fraction of the vaccine-related serious health problems, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths that have actually occurred in the U.S.
Note: Reporting vaccine injury is not mandatory.
Studies have estimated that less than 10 percent, to as little as ONE percent, of vaccine side effects are ever reported, so the true side effects and deaths are easily FAR higher than the reported statistics represent. This means there may have been anywhere from 3600 to 36,000 deaths that have occurred in the US alone after children or adults received measles containing vaccines. The Dangers of the Measles Vaccine to Infants
The Sydney Morning Herald parrots pharmaceutical industry claims that vaccines are safe, ignoring the evidence. Institute of Medicine adverse reactions report admits MMR vaccines cause measles, seizures, anaphylaxis and other health problems
Virologists give evidence of falsification of data and inadequate testing by Merk. Merck Accused of Lying About Mumps Vaccine
MMR (measles, mumps & rubella)
Italian Health Ministry admits MMR vaccine caused autism. Dr Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 study that suggested links between MMR, chronic bowel inflammation and lost gut flora has been confirmed in dozens of studies worldwide; but the pharmaceutical industry’s rebuttal and vicious attacks against Andrew Wakefield have been widely reported in the Murdoch media, as justified (see links on Wakefield). httItalian Court Reignites MMR Vaccine Debate
Italian court rules MMR vaccine did trigger autism
New Evidence Supports Dr. Wakefield's MMR Vaccine Study
Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s Interview on His MMR Study
CDC Autism Researcher Indicted for Fraud
MMR causes autism in test monkeys. Monkeys Get Autism-like Reactions to MMR & Other Vaccines In University of Pittsburgh Vaccine Study | Vactruth.com
PERTUSSIS (whooping cough)
83% of children with whooping cough were already vaccinated. One doctor says he still recommends the vaccine because it marginally reduces the distressing symptoms. Vaccine failure admitted: Whooping cough outbreaks higher among children already vaccinated
SIDS is linked to vaccines. Hepatitis B Vaccine Highly Linked to Sudden Infant Death
How Technology Has Made Global Polio Eradication Impossible | Pakalert Press
With outrageous dishonesty, doctors invariably present the defeat of polio as generated by the polio vaccine. The 1950s outbreak of polio was due to post-war malnutrition, shortage of housing, and the war-time breakdown of personal hygiene. Because the bacterium responsible is found in human excrement, a massive campaign in hand-washing after going to the toilet was highly successful, facilitated by the manufacture of tissue-type toilet paper and the expedited installation of in-house flush toilets.
Prior to this, most homes had outhouses, with toilet paper typically being that week’s newspaper, which was less than pliant or safe.
These innovations removed the cause of transmission and the polio epidemic ceased.
Ironically, in the face of vaccine sceptics, doctors love to conjure up the1950s horrors of children deformed by wasted limbs, cheerfully oblivious to the true cause. Registered nurse, Queenslander Sister Elizabeth Kenny, discovered that by applying massage therapy to the affected limbs, the children under her care recovered full use of their limbs. Meanwhile, all doctors immobilised paralysed limbs with plaster of paris and these were the children who permanently lost use of those limbs, which remained shrivelled for life.
When confronted by this horrific outcome comparison, would we not expect the good doctors to hug Sister Kenny and to joyfully embrace her methodology?
The doctors, quite apart from their natural misogyny and resentment of medical women who did not know their place, realised that if the truth got out they would face massive litigation and possible criminal prosecution for negligence and malpractice.
They did the only thing they could and put Kenny in prison for five years… for practicing medicine without a licence. Clearly, Australian judiciary have less respect for truth and justice than in other national jurisdictions.
It is not known how many kids lost the use of their limbs after that. But as with all other diseases, later vaccinations had nothing to do with the demise of the polio epidemic. And relieved doctors retained their mafia-like monopoly over disease mitigation, more recently realising that the sicker people are the more money doctors make. To this end, many have abandoned clinic and surgery hand hygiene (estimated by one doctor to be one third of all Australian doctors, a position which he told the ABC has put Australian medicine back to the standards of the 19th century).
Crushing people who are genuine healers and medical saviours is a long-established medical tradition in Australia. The doctor who first blew the whistle on Thalidomide, Dr William McBride, was banned from practicing medicine until 1998… almost half a century. He was not recognised for his courageous role until 2018, when an ABC TV journalist unwittingly released the truth.
A West Australian doctor who successfully treated cancer victims with Black Salve (aka Cansema), a 2000 year old remedy now enhanced with DMSO, was also deregistered. Although veterinarians have also used this since forever, it is now illegal for them to buy or sell this product. Yet, as this author can attest, Cansema dissolves skin cancers (including clinically-diagnosed advanced squamous cell carcinomas) in just twelve days, at a cost of a few dollars.
Australian doctors, like doctors elsewhere, can best be described as members of a ruthless professional mafia, who imprison competition and whistle-blowers, and routinely kill their victims. To those who might regard such a view as extreme, I challenge them to put the evidence included in this article before any medical doctor and observe the anger, repudiation, aggression, and flat refusal to test the evidence for validity. Their guilt is ipso facto.
Processing the evidence
If you did not read this article, the following graphs alone are an indictment of the vaccination industry. The curves parallel the history of disease mitigation as presented by Public Health courses throughout most of the 20th century. There has never been any attempt to deny the accuracy of the graphs. Doctors merely pretend they do not exist.
A series of graphs showing impacts of vaccines are in stark conflict with official claims: Immunization-Graphs-Complete.pdf (application/pdf Object)
Doctors are regularly paid off by pharmaceutical corporations… the correct word is bribed. Eli Lilly admits to more than $200 million dollars worth of doctor payoffs
Dr Blaylock Vaccines and Autism Part 1 of 14 - YouTube
Concluding comments: Vaccines are never 100 percent protective because they provide only temporary, typically inferior immunity compared to that your body would receive from naturally contracting and recovering from a disease. This becomes a question of balance: advantages of the vaccine as opposed to negative effects. Although tetanus vaccinations were initially presumed by me to be efficacious, it was nevertheless difficult to obtain a tetanus shot not contaminated by diphtheria and pertussis. Check diphtheria on the graphs; it caused an increase in incidence.
One might well ask, why? While researching for an uncontaminated tetanus shot we were provided with evidence that makes even tetanus vaccines unsupportable. Tetanus will be covered later in the article.
Your Gut Flora Affects Your Physical and Mental Health
Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride on GAPS Nutritional Program
In Memoriam: Infant Deaths and Vaccination
Vaccine Study | Vactruth.com
Not only does Campbell-McBride’s prevention recommendations and treatment work, there are also successful treatments for advanced cases…
Pharmaceutical industry crimes
GlaxoSmithKline pleads guilty to criminal fraud charges, pays massive $3 billion in fines
Harvard Study Shows the Effects of Fluoride on Children's IQ
Obamacare Mandate: 15-Year-Old Girls Receive Free Sterilizations Without Parental Consent | Pakalert Press
Immunization-Graphs-Complete.pdf (application/pdf Object)
seizures, anaphylaxis and other health problems
In Memoriam: Infant Deaths and Vaccination
Understanding gut flora
Ninety percent of the genetic material in our body is not ours, but from the nearly 100 trillion bacteria, fungi, viruses and other microorganisms that compose our microflora.
Our microflora influences our genetic expression, our immune system, weight, mental health, memory (PLEASE NOTE, THOSE WHO FEAR DEMENTIA), and our risk of numerous chronic and acute diseases, from diabetes to cancer.
It is becoming increasingly clear that destroying our gut flora with antibiotics, vaccine adjuvents, and poor diet, are primary factors in rising disease rates. Recent research suggests intestinal inflammation may play a crucial role in the development of certain cancers; accelerated by sugars.
Avoiding antibiotics and beef derived from feedlot cattle dosed with hormones: rBGH in meat and rBST- poisoned milk cows (Posilac); and avoiding sugar by adhering to a low-sugar diet, along with plenty of unpasteurised fermented foods and/or a high-quality probiotic supplement, are crucial elements for restoring and maintaining both our gut’s inner ecosystem and our overall health.
Growing our own vegetables or buying organic, are other essential measures. We make these recommendations because these echo the advice offered by organisations and individuals who have impressed us with their competence and integrity.
The question on the lips of citizens who view the evidence
Why are the medical profession, government, and the pharmaceutical industry so adamantly opposed to independent and transparent national research into these issues?
Conversely, why are doctors and scientists of integrity; who point to independent research results implicating medical products in human injury and death, always subjected to character assassination, vilification, and occupational blacklisting; along with ‘medical science’s’ refusal to address the evidence they produce (see links on Dr Andrew Wakefield)?
This is especially the case with vaccine problems, GM food effects on health, contraindicated drugs and other pharmaceuticals, and even routine medical procedures that, alarmingly, have never been supported by evidence or testing (60% of).
It is in the public interest, therefore, to present this compilation of evidence to all Australians.
As an Australian citizen I declare the right to draw my own conclusions, while you, the reader, can equally judge for yourself. Such self-protection assessments do not require medical training; merely average intelligence and the capacity to read and to think analytically; avenues which are the inalienable right of every citizen.
As has been pointed out by expert immunologists, vaccinations do not provide the same protection as natural resistance gained from the disease itself. In spite of expert assurances over several decades, that vaccinations will one day rid humanity of disease, increasingly it has been found that regular boosters are required; that some vaccinations do not work at all (ie flu, pertussis); and that others (Chicken pox) produce effects worse than the original disease (ie childhood shingles, which can destroy eyesight). Ingri Cassel of the VLF in Idaho provided information on tetanus history and vaccines Tetanus – The Disease and the Vaccine, which means the tetanus vaccination too is now rejected.
The AMA has always adopted the self-serving attitude that only qualified medicos have the right to decide whether or not remedies, treatments and procedures are good for us; which is plainly an elitist, corrupt and anti-democratic stance. I am not proselytising my own opinion but I do insist that it is my right to make my own decisions, in the interests of protecting my health and my life; and that of my children and grandchildren.
Moreover, the doctors who lobby government for mandatory vaccinations, a practice (ie mandatory medical intervention) universally condemned following its use by the Nazi’s Dr Joseph Mengele’s during WWII, will undoubtedly one day challenge their stance.
It is difficult to identify whether these doctor’s lack integrity, are simply deficient in intelligence, or are willingly ignorant of any research that opposes their self-serving mercenary views. As the internet enables a wider cross-section of the nation to comprehend autism and its relationship with vaccine damage and mismanagement of antibiotics, it will be for the courts and the electorate to judge culpability. Like many Australians, I look forward to protection of children from such injury, and proper care for those already afflicted.
To offer some encouragement as to how easy it is to apply the science of tipping point to the vaccine controversy, for seven years I peppered the Sunshine Coast media with rebuttals to the oft-appearing promotion of vaccines by local doctors. Initially, I was reviled and ridiculed by fellow readers, but by year seven it was the doctors (invariably in troll form) who were being ridiculed. The Sunshine Coast now boasts 30%of the population who refuse to be vaccinated.
The provided links have stirred governments to act in Europe and in the Russian-influenced states; but not in the US or Australia. No doubt, this failure will eventually provoke legal challenges directed at the AMA and Federal and State portfolio holders.
We look forward to their prosecution and imprisonment.
Tony Ryan is a social and geopolitical researcher and cross-cultural analyst, specialising in Aboriginal development issues in Arnhem Land.
Believing firmly that one must live one’s subject matter to deserve credibility, he has had previous careers in cattle, education, journalism, crane operation, trade unions, welfare, community development, landscaping, safari operation, real estate, and publishing.
Disclaimer: I am merely a health product consumer and I make no claim to be an expert in anything whatsoever and cannot, therefore, be judged as expert or professional. Thus, the Australian Medical Association's usual method of silencing critics... prosecution for practicing medicine without a licence... cannot be applied to me.
Secondly, as a component of various university courses (education, social welfare) I was required to study Public Health, which memorably held that historical disease incidence reduction occurred following a series of initiatives: 1880s introduction of sewerage systems; establishment of clean drinking water reservoirs; garbage collection; improved housing; enhanced nutrition; public education, facilitating health education; the discovery of antibiotics; and a succession of preventive environmental health programmes.
With this dichotomy of public health successes were accompanying graphs which time-sequenced these events and their impact on disease incidence. Time-honoured public health knowledge suddenly evaporated and we were told that vaccinations were responsible. Like any other thinking person aged 70 and over, this provoked skepticism; but worse was to come.
As a consumer, parent and grandparent, addressing a vast plethora of salient health concerns, I now see evidence that doctors and the pharmaceutical industry are injuring not only adults, but babies and children.
We Australians need to brush aside a century of indoctrination which prevents us from recognising what should be flagrantly obvious, which is that the sickness industry is immensely lucrative, and which is even more profitable the more we get sick. Healing is bad for business.
As noted earlier in the text, there are doctors who do recognise this and they get punished by the ruthless Medical Mafia for speaking out. For example, the doctor who exposed thalidomide lost his licence for several decades. Another doctor, who pointed to the evidence that the MMR vaccine contributed to autism, had his licence removed despite an Italian Court judgement that supported his evidence. A WA doctor had his licence removed for curing cancer, a cure known as Cansema, which I have used successfully fifteen times.
It is possible that a Royal Commission of Inquiry might expose these criminals but I am not optimistic. I suspect that only direct action will protect our innocent sick.
© Copyright Tony Ryan 2018